Prognosis in Renal Carcinoma Evaluated from Histological Criteria
- 1 January 1974
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Scandinavian Journal of Urology and Nephrology
- Vol. 8 (3) , 198-202
- https://doi.org/10.3109/00365597409132129
Abstract
Microscopic preparations of renal tumours from 76 nephrectomized patients were reviewed retrospectively, to establish a possible dependence of the prognosis on various histological criteria. The preparations were twice reviewed “blind”. The three criteria, cell type, necrosis, and structure, were found to be reproducible from the first to the second examination, but this was not the case with invasion. Of the three parameters, only cell type and necrosis were significant for the prognosis, tumours without necrosis and composed of clear cells having the best prognosis, while tumours composed of granular cells had the poorest prognosis. If there was more than one section from a tumour, there was often great variance in morphology from section to section. This finding has not been studied statistically in the present investigation.This publication has 9 references indexed in Scilit:
- Long-Term Survival After Nephrectomy for Adenocarcinoma RenisScandinavian Journal of Urology and Nephrology, 1972
- Diagnosis and management of renal cell carcinomaA clinical and pathologic study of 309 casesCancer, 1971
- Renal CarcinomaActa Medica Scandinavica, 1966
- Concerning the Relationship Between the Morphology and the Symptomatology of HypernephromaUrologia Internationalis, 1963
- Clinical Manifestations and Cytology of HypernephromasJournal of Urology, 1961
- The Structure of Renal Carcinoma Correlated to its Clinical BehaviorJournal of Urology, 1959
- NEW GROWTHS OF THE KIDNEY AND URETER1British Journal of Urology, 1951
- PARENCHYMAL CARCINOMA OF THE KIDNEYBritish Journal of Urology, 1949
- Classification of Renal Neoplasms: A Clinical and Pathological Study Based on 199 CasesJournal of Urology, 1944