Detection of malformations in chromosomally normal fetuses by routine ultrasound at 12 or 18 weeks of gestation—a randomised controlled trial in 39 572 pregnancies
- 18 May 2006
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology
- Vol. 113 (6) , 664-674
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-0528.2006.00953.x
Abstract
Objective To compare the antenatal detection rate of malformations in chromosomally normal fetuses between a strategy of offering one routine ultrasound examination at 12 gestational weeks (gws) and a strategy of offering one routine examination at 18 gws.Design Randomised controlled trial.Setting Multicentre trial including eight hospitals.Population A total of 39 572 unselected pregnant women.Methods Women were randomised either to one routine ultrasound scan at 12 (12–14) gws including nuchal translucency (NT) measurement or to one routine scan at 18 (15–22) gws. Anomaly screening was performed in both groups following a check‐list. A repeat scan was offered in the 12‐week scan group if the fetal anatomy could not be adequately seen at 12–14 gws or if NT was ≥3.5 mm in a fetus with normal or unknown chromosomes.Main outcome measures Antenatal detection rate of malformed fetuses.Results The antenatal detection rate of fetuses with a major malformation was 38% (66/176) in the 12‐week scan group and 47% (72/152) in the 18‐week scan group (P= 0.06). The corresponding figures for detection at P= 0.07). In the 12‐week scan group, 69% of fetuses with a lethal anomaly were detected at a scan at 12–14 gws.Conclusions None of the two strategies for prenatal diagnosis is clearly superior to the other. The 12‐week strategy has the advantage that most lethal malformations will be detected at <15 gws, enabling earlier pregnancy termination. The 18‐week strategy seems to be associated with a slightly higher detection rate of major malformations, although the difference was not statistically significant.Keywords
This publication has 42 references indexed in Scilit:
- Ultrasound dating at 12–14 or 15–20 weeks of gestation? A prospective cross‐validation of established dating formulae in a population of in‐vitro fertilized pregnancies randomized to early or late dating scanUltrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2004
- Is nuchal translucency screening associated with different rates of invasive testing in an older obstetric population?American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2004
- Ultrasound screening of fetal structural abnormalities at 12 to 14 weeks in Hong KongPrenatal Diagnosis, 2004
- Learning curve in ultrasonographic screening for selected fetal structural anomalies in early pregnancyObstetrics & Gynecology, 2003
- Womens' preference in Down syndrome screeningPrenatal Diagnosis, 2002
- Natural history of fetal hydronephrosis diagnosed on mid‐trimester ultrasoundUltrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2001
- Defects and syndromes in chromosomally normal fetuses with increased nuchal translucency thickness at 10–14 weeks of gestationUltrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology, 1998
- Comparison of First and Second Trimester Screening for Fetal AnomaliesAnnals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1998
- Prenatal diagnosis of neural tube defect before 12 weeks' gestation: direct and indirect ultrasonographic semeiologyUltrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology, 1997
- Screening for fetal anomalies by ultrasound at 14 and 21 weeksUltrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology, 1997