Evaluation of four gentamicin and tobramycin assay procedures for clinical laboratories
- 1 October 1983
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Society for Microbiology in Journal of Clinical Microbiology
- Vol. 18 (4) , 890-894
- https://doi.org/10.1128/jcm.18.4.890-894.1983
Abstract
Accuracy, precision and clinical laboraotry utility of the TDX, Auto-ICS, COBAS-Bio with reagent kits and EMIT [enzyme-multiplied immuno technique] for gentamicin and tobramycin [antibacterial agents] serum assay were assessed. TDX, COBAS-Bio and EMIT analytical systems showed a proportional bias of < 10% for recovery studies and a coefficient of variation < 5% for within-run precision. The results of the recovery studies with the Auto-ICS showed a proportional bias of 25% with gentamicin and 16% with tobramycin. The within-run precision expressed as the coefficient of variation for the Auto-ICS was 6.7% for gentamicin and 8.6% for tobramycin. In comparisons involving gentamicin- and tobramycin-containing patient samples, the results with the TDX analytical system showed the best agreement with the COBAS-Bio. For the determination of these 2 antibiotics, the TDX analytical system provided the best overall accuracy and precision.This publication has 6 references indexed in Scilit:
- Comparative evaluation of three methods for measuring gentamicin and tobramycin in serumAntimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, 1981
- Evaluation of five gentamicin assay procedures for clinical microbiology laboratoriesJournal of Clinical Microbiology, 1981
- Evaluation of serum gentamicin assay procedures for a clinical microbiology laboratoryJournal of Clinical Microbiology, 1980
- Incorrect least-squares regression coefficients in method-comparison analysis.Clinical Chemistry, 1979
- Radioimmunoassay, acetylating radio-enzymatic assay, and microbioassay of gentamicin: a comparative study.1975