Effects of Orientation and Redundancy on Tactual Perception of Form
- 1 August 1968
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Perceptual and Motor Skills
- Vol. 27 (1) , 83-89
- https://doi.org/10.2466/pms.1968.27.1.83
Abstract
The present study determined the effects of absolute spatial orientation and Redundancy-I on the tactual recognition of metric figures. Four orientations (base horizontal distinctive contour upward, base horizontal distinctive contour downward, base vertical distinctive contour to S's right, base vertical distinctive contour to S's left) were used with random and redundant figures. The stimuli displayed consisted of raised dots; standard Braille values were employed for dot height and spacing. In terms of both speed and accuracy of recognition, performance was better for random than for redundant figures. The effect of spatial orientation was negligible. Results are considered in regard to the comparative influence of similar stimulus parameters in the perception of visual and tactual form.Keywords
This publication has 11 references indexed in Scilit:
- Effects of Complexity and Redundancy on the Tactual Recognition of Metric FiguresPerceptual and Motor Skills, 1967
- Effects of choice-figure rotation on the visual perception of formPsychonomic Science, 1966
- Visual and tactual identification of form orientationJournal of Experimental Child Psychology, 1966
- Metrics of visual form.Psychological Bulletin, 1965
- Effects of a transphenomenal parameter on the visual perception of formPsychonomic Science, 1965
- Disorientation of forms: An examination of Rock’s theoryPsychonomic Science, 1965
- Statistical principles in experimental design.Published by American Psychological Association (APA) ,1962
- On the Use of Information Measures in Studies of Form PerceptionPerceptual and Motor Skills, 1960
- The Orientation of Forms on the Retina and in the EnvironmentThe American Journal of Psychology, 1956
- Stimulus correlates of visual pattern recognition: a probability approach.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1956