Influence of Cell Cycle and Oncogene Activity upon Topoisomerase IIα Expression and Drug Toxicity
Open Access
- 1 December 2000
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Molecular and Cellular Biology
- Vol. 20 (24) , 9127-9137
- https://doi.org/10.1128/mcb.20.24.9127-9137.2000
Abstract
The cell cycle, oncogenic signaling, and topoisomerase (topo) IIα levels all influence sensitivity to anti-topo II drugs. Because the cell cycle and oncogenic signaling influence each other as well as topo IIα levels, it is difficult to assess the importance of any one of these factors independently of the others during drug treatment. Such information, however, is vital to an understanding of the cellular basis of drug toxicity. We, therefore, developed a series of analytical procedures to individually assess the role of each of these factors during treatment with the anti-topo II drug etoposide. All studies were performed with asynchronously proliferating cultures by the use of time-lapse and quantitative fluorescence staining procedures. To our surprise, we found that neither oncogene action nor the cell cycle altered topo IIα protein levels in actively cycling cells. Only a minor population of slowly cycling cells within these cultures responded to constitutively active oncogenes by elevating topo IIα production. Thus, it was possible to study the effects of the cell cycle and oncogene action on drug-treated cells while topo IIα levels remained constant. Toxicity analyses were performed with two consecutive time-lapse observations separated by a brief drug treatment. The cell cycle phase was determined from the first observation, and cell fate was determined from the second. Cells were most sensitive to drug treatment from mid-S phase through G2 phase, with G1 phase cells nearly threefold less sensitive. In addition, the presence of an oncogenicsrc gene or microinjected Ras protein increased drug toxicity by approximately threefold in actively cycling cells and by at least this level in the small population of slowly cycling cells. We conclude that both cell cycle phase and oncogenic signaling influence drug toxicity independently of alterations in topo IIα levels.Keywords
This publication has 44 references indexed in Scilit:
- Ras stimulates DNA topoisomerase IIα through MEK: A link between oncogenic signaling and a therapeutic targetOncogene, 1999
- Cell cycle arrest and morphological alterations following microinjection of NIH3T3 cells with PuraαOncogene, 1999
- Evidence for a critical role of DNA topoisomerase IIα in drug sensitivity revealed by inducible antisense RNA in a human leukaemia cell lineBritish Journal of Haematology, 1998
- Oncogenic transformation potentiates apoptosis, S-phase arrest and stress-kinase activation by etoposideOncogene, 1997
- Cell Cycle-Dependent Regulation of the Mouse DNA Topoisomerase IIα Gene PromoterBiochemical and Biophysical Research Communications, 1997
- DNA topoisomerase II mutations and resistance to anti‐tumor drugsBioEssays, 1995
- Existence of a commitment program for mitosis in early G1 in tumour cellsCell Proliferation, 1995
- Higher Expression of Topoisomerase II in Lung Cancers Than Normal Lung Tissues: Different Expression Pattern from Topoisomerase IBiochemical and Biophysical Research Communications, 1993
- Monoclonal antibodies to human DNA topoisomerase I and the two isoforms of DNA topoisomerase II: 170- and 180-kDa isozymesExperimental Cell Research, 1992
- DNA TOPOISOMERASESAnnual Review of Biochemistry, 1985