Fluid resuscitation in severe sepsis and septic shock: An evidence-based review
- 1 November 2004
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Critical Care Medicine
- Vol. 32 (Supplement) , S451-S454
- https://doi.org/10.1097/01.ccm.0000142984.44321.a4
Abstract
In 2003, critical care and infectious disease experts representing 11 international organizations developed management guidelines for fluid resuscitation in severe sepsis and septic shock that would be of practical use for the bedside clinician, under the auspices of the Surviving Sepsis Campaign, an international effort to increase awareness and improve outcome in severe sepsis. The process included a modified Delphi method, a consensus conference, several subsequent smaller meetings of subgroups and key individuals, teleconferences, and electronic-based discussion among subgroups and among the entire committee. The modified Delphi methodology used for grading recommendations built on a 2001 publication sponsored by the International Sepsis Forum. We undertook a systematic review of the literature graded along five levels to create recommendation grades from A to E, with A being the highest grade. Pediatric considerations to contrast adult and pediatric management are in the article by Parker et al. on p. S591. Fluid resuscitation of severe sepsis may consist of natural or artificial colloids or crystalloids. Fluid challenge should be administered and repeated based on response (increase in blood pressure and urine output) and tolerance (evidence of intravascular volume overload).Keywords
This publication has 27 references indexed in Scilit:
- In vivo effect of haemodilution with saline on coagulation: a randomized controlled trial † †This article is accompanied by Editorial II. ‡ ‡Declaration of interest. This study was supported by a CRCG grant from the Faculty of Medicine, the University of Hong Kong (Acc Code 337/038/0013). We also thank the Department of Surgery, the University of Hong Kong for supplying the TEG used in this study and Ms Jeff Man for her technical assistance.British Journal of Anaesthesia, 2002
- Are Lactated Ringer’s Solution and Normal Saline Solution Equal with Regard to Coagulation?: RetractedAnesthesia & Analgesia, 2002
- Voluven®, a Lower Substituted Novel Hydroxyethyl Starch (HES 130/0.4), Causes Fewer Effects on Coagulation in Major Orthopedic Surgery than HES 200/0.5Anesthesia & Analgesia, 2001
- Effects of hydroxyethylstarch and gelatin on renal function in severe sepsis: a multicentre randomised studyThe Lancet, 2001
- Coagulation effects of a recently developed hydroxyethyl starch (HES 130/0.4) compared to hydroxyethyl starches with higher molecular weightActa Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica, 2000
- Assessment of hemodynamic and gastric mucosal acidosis with modified fluid gelatin versus 6% hydroxyethyl starch: a prospective, randomized studyIntensive Care Medicine, 2000
- Crystalloids vs. colloids in fluid resuscitationCritical Care Medicine, 1999
- Fluid resuscitation with colloid or crystalloid solutions in critically ill patients: a systematic review of randomised trialsBMJ, 1998
- Fluid resuscitation in circulatory shockCritical Care Medicine, 1983
- Optimum left heart filling pressure during fluid resuscitation of patients with hypovolemic and septic shockCritical Care Medicine, 1983