Comparison of contrast-normalization and threshold models of the responses of simple cells in cat striate cortex
- 1 March 1997
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Maximum Academic Press in Visual Neuroscience
- Vol. 14 (2) , 293-309
- https://doi.org/10.1017/s0952523800011433
Abstract
In almost every study of the linearity of spatiotemporal summation in simple cells of the cat's visual cortex, there have been systematic mismatches between the experimental observations and the predictions of the linear theory. These mismatches have generally been explained by supposing that the initial spatiotemporal summation stage is strictly linear, but that the following output stage of the simple cell is subject to some contrast-dependent nonlinearity. Two main models of the output nonlinearity have been proposed: the threshold model (e.g. Tolhurst & Dean, 1987) and the contrast-normalization model (e.g. Heeger, 1992a, b). In this paper, the two models are fitted rigorously to a variety of previously published neurophysiological data, in order to determine whether one model is a better explanation of the data. We reexamine data on the interaction between two bar stimuli presented in different parts of the receptive field; on the relationship between the receptive-field map and the inverse Fourier transform of the spatial-frequency tuning curve; on the dependence of response amplitude and phase on the spatial phase of stationary gratings; on the relationships between the responses to moving and modulated gratings; and on the suppressive action of gratings moving in a neuron's nonpreferred direction. In many situations, the predictions of the two models are similar, but the contrast-normalization model usually fits the data slightly better than the threshold model, and it is easier to apply the equations of the normalization model. More importantly, the normalization model is naturally able to account very well for the details and subtlety of the results in experiments where the total contrast energy of the stimuli changes; some of these phenomena are completely beyond the scope of the threshold model. Rigorous application of the models' equations has revealed some situations where neither model fits quite well enough, and we must suppose, therefore, that there are some subtle nonlinearities still to be characterized.Keywords
This publication has 68 references indexed in Scilit:
- Modeling the Apparent Frequency-specific Suppression in Simple Cell ResponsesVision Research, 1997
- Directional selectivity and spatiotemporal structure of receptive fields of simple cells in cat striate cortexJournal of Neurophysiology, 1991
- The effects of contrast on the linearity of spatial summation of simple cells in the cat's striate cortexExperimental Brain Research, 1990
- The effect of threshold on the relationship between the receptive-field profile and the spatial-frequency tuning cure in simple cells of the cat's striate cortexVisual Neuroscience, 1989
- The amount of information transmitted about contrast by neurones in the cat's visual cortexVisual Neuroscience, 1989
- Simple cells in the visual cortex of the cat can be narrowly tuned for spatial frequencyVisual Neuroscience, 1988
- Linear mechanisms of directional selectivity in simple cells of cat striate cortex.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 1987
- Relationship between spatial-frequency and orientation tuning of striate-cortex cellsJournal of the Optical Society of America A, 1985
- The statistical reliability of signals in single neurons in cat and monkey visual cortexVision Research, 1983
- On the variety of spatial frequency selectivities shown by neurons in area 17 of the catProceedings of the Royal Society of London. B. Biological Sciences, 1981