Gender Identity and Adversarial Sexual Beliefs as Predictors of Attitudes Toward Sexual Harassment
- 1 June 1993
- journal article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Psychology of Women Quarterly
- Vol. 17 (2) , 169-175
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.1993.tb00442.x
Abstract
The present study replicates the work of Konrad and Gutek (1986) within a college sample and extends their work by examining the impact of gender identity and adversarial sexual beliefs as predictors of attitudes toward sexual harassment. One hundred seven college students indicated specific aspects of their direct experiences with sexual harassment and then completed several attitudinal measures. Endorsement of adversarial sexual beliefs and experience with sexual harassment significantly predicted negative (less tolerant) attitudes toward sexual harassment for male respondents. Strong gender group identity and the endorsement of adversarial sexual beliefs significantly predicted negative (less tolerant) attitudes toward sexual harassment for female students. Implications for the focus of intervention strategies within an academic environment are discussed.Keywords
This publication has 10 references indexed in Scilit:
- Collective self-esteem and ingroup bias.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1990
- Students' experiences of sexual harassment at a small universitySex Roles, 1989
- The incidence and dimensions of sexual harassment in academia and the workplaceJournal of Vocational Behavior, 1988
- Sexual harassment of university studentsSex Roles, 1986
- Impact of Work Experiences on Attitudes Toward Sexual HarassmentAdministrative Science Quarterly, 1986
- Gender differences in sexual attitudes.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1985
- Cultural myths and supports for rape.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1980
- In-group bias in the minimal intergroup situation: A cognitive-motivational analysis.Psychological Bulletin, 1979
- Masculinity and FemininityPublished by University of Texas Press ,1978
- Cognitive Aspects of Prejudice1Journal of Social Issues, 1969