Repeated measures screening for Down's Syndrome
- 8 September 2004
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology
- Vol. 112 (1) , 80-83
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-0528.2004.00343.x
Abstract
Objective To demonstrate the potential value of screening for Down's Syndrome using highly correlated repeated measures of serum markers taken in the first and second trimesters of pregnancy.Design A Monte Carlo simulation study.Population Detection rates and false positive rates relating to the maternal age distribution of England and Wales for the period 1996 to 1998 were obtained using marker distributions from the SURUSS study.Results Screening using first trimester nuchal translucency and repeated measures of uE3 and PAPP‐A in the first and second trimester has an estimated false positive rate of 0.3% for an 85% detection rate. This should be compared with the integrated test with an estimated false positive rate of 1.2% for the same detection rate.Conclusions The performance of repeated measures screening tests, and their acceptability to women, should be assessed in further prospective studies.Keywords
This publication has 6 references indexed in Scilit:
- First and second trimester antenatal screening for Down's syndrome: the results of the Serum, Urine and Ultrasound Screening Study (SURUSS)Health Technology Assessment, 2003
- Comparison between disclosure and non-disclosure approaches for trisomy 21 screening tests.Human Reproduction, 2002
- Growing complexity in the choice of Down's syndrome screening policyUltrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2002
- Prenatal Screening for Down's Syndrome — A Search for the Family's ValuesNew England Journal of Medicine, 1999
- Integrated Screening for Down's Syndrome Based on Tests Performed during the First and Second TrimestersNew England Journal of Medicine, 1999
- Statistical Prediction AnalysisPublished by Cambridge University Press (CUP) ,1975