Problems with Interval Estimates of the Incremental Cost—Effectiveness Ratio
- 1 January 1999
- journal article
- other
- Published by SAGE Publications in Medical Decision Making
- Vol. 19 (1) , 9-15
- https://doi.org/10.1177/0272989x9901900102
Abstract
The defining feature of a confidence interval is that it has a fixed minimum probability of covering the true value of the parameter being estimated, whatever the value of the parameter. The authors demonstrate by simulation that some recently proposed meth ods for interval estimation of the incremental cost—effectiveness ratio (ICER) either do not satisfy this definition or have other problems that limit their usefulness in applica tions. The problems are most prominent when the ICER is large and the true effec tiveness difference is small relative to its standard error. A modification of the percentile bootstrap confidence interval that involves a reordering of the sample space provides a partial solution of the problem. Key words: bootstrap; clinical trials; confidence inter vals ; cost—effectiveness ratios; Fieller's method; Taylor series. (Med Decis Making 1999;19:9-15)Keywords
This publication has 7 references indexed in Scilit:
- Net Health BenefitsMedical Decision Making, 1998
- Pulling cost-effectiveness analysis up by its bootstraps: A non-parametric approach to confidence interval estimationHealth Economics, 1997
- The Negative Side of Cost-effectiveness AnalysisPublished by American Medical Association (AMA) ,1997
- Statistical Inference for Cost-Effectiveness RatiosHealth Economics, 1997
- Confidence Intervals for Cost-Effectiveness Ratios: A Comparison of Four MethodsHealth Economics, 1997
- ESTIMATING CONFIDENCE INTERVALS FOR COST-EFFECTIVENESS RATIOS: AN EXAMPLE FROM A RANDOMIZED TRIALStatistics in Medicine, 1996
- In Search of Power and Significance: Issues in the Design and Analysis of Stochastic Cost-Effectiveness Studies in Health CareMedical Care, 1994