Effects of Audiometric Configuration on the Auditory Brain Stem Response
- 1 February 1987
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Ear & Hearing
- Vol. 8 (1) , 49-55
- https://doi.org/10.1097/00003446-198702000-00009
Abstract
Evidence reported in the literature indicates that wave I of the auditory brain stem response is influenced by cochlear contributions from a more basal area of the cochlea than is wave V. This phenomenon is invoked to explain different latency-intensity function patterns of waves I and V and the I-V interval for four types of cochlear hearing loss. In high frequency hearing losses wave V is delayed at low intensities. Wave I tends to be delayed at all intensities and by a greater amount than wave V. The I-V interval is often reduced with the effect maximal at higher intensities. Low frequency hearing losses tend to cause early wave V latencies at low intensities. Wave I latencies are normal. The I-V interval is therefore reduced at lower intensities. Flat hearing losses produce normal latency-intensity functions. High frequency notched audiograms are almost always associated with delayed wave V but early wave I latencies. The I-V interval is therefore significantly prolonged with the effect maximal at low intensities. The variability of the I-V interval as a function of audiometric configuration indicates that it is not a pure measure of central conduction time.This publication has 9 references indexed in Scilit:
- Masking effects on ABR waves I and V in infants and adultsThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1986
- Auditory Brainstem Responses in a Case of High-Frequency Conductive Hearing LossJournal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 1985
- Physiological (waves I and V) and psychophysical tuning curves in human subjectsThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1981
- BSR (wave V) and N1 latencies in response to acoustic stimuli with different bandwidthsThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1979
- Prediction of Sensorineural Hearing Level From the Brain Stem Evoked ResponseJAMA Otolaryngology–Head & Neck Surgery, 1978
- Analysis of the click-evoked brainstem potentials in man using high-pass noise maskingThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1978
- Human Auditory Nerve Action Potentials and Brain Stem Evoked Responses: Effects of Audiogram Shape and Lesion LocationJAMA Otolaryngology–Head & Neck Surgery, 1977
- Far Field Electrocochleography. Frequency Specificity of the ResponseScandinavian Audiology, 1975
- Action Potentirals Along the Cochlear Partition Recorded from the ear Canal in ManScandinavian Audiology, 1974