A double‐blind, controlled evaluation of zimeldine, imipramine and placebo in patients with primary affective disorders

Publisher Website
Google Scholar
Abstract
ABSTRACT— Zimeldine, imipramine and placebo were studied in a randomized, double‐blind, parallel group comparison of 119 patients with primary affective disorders. These out‐patients were between 18 and 65 years of age and all received placebo single‐blind during an initial 3–7‐day washout period. During the subsequent 6‐week double‐blind period, patients were titrated from 50 mg b.d. to 150 mg b.d. with zimeldine, a potent and selective inhibitor of 5‐HT reuptake, with imipramine, an inhibitor of noradrenaline and 5‐HT reuptake, or with a corresponding number of placebo capsules.The zimeldine treatment group had significantly lower mean HAM‐D scale total scores than the placebo and imipramine groups at week 4 and last available assessment. There was a significantly greater proportion of patients showing an improvement of 50% or more in HAM‐D score, among the zimeldine group than in the placebo group at week 4, and among the imipramine group at weeks 4, 6 and last available assessment. The Clinical Global Impression (CGI) scales and the 56‐item Hopkins Symptom Check‐list (HSCL‐56) self‐rating inventory both showed significantly more improvement in the zimeldine patients than in the placebo or the imipramine patients.Fewer zimeldine patients reported adverse experiences than imipramine patients. Dry mouth was the most frequently reported adverse experience, occurring significantly more often in the imipramine group than the zimeldine or the placebo groups; significantly more zimeldine than placebo patients reported dry mouth. Headache was the only other adverse experience which occurred more often in the zimeldine than in the placebo group. The imipramine group had consistently higher mean pulse rates than the other two groups, and postural hypotension was also more common in the imipramine group.