Interpreting the role of suppression in psychophysical tuning curves
- 1 November 1982
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Acoustical Society of America (ASA) in The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
- Vol. 72 (5) , 1374-1379
- https://doi.org/10.1121/1.388441
Abstract
We describe two models which make different assumptions about the factors determining threshold for psychophysical tuning curves (PTCs) determined in simultaneous masking. The models make different predictions about the amount of activity evoked by off‐frequency maskers in the frequency region of the signal. The predictions were tested by using a forward‐masking technique to estimate the amount of this activity. The data support a model which assumes that threshold in simultaneous masking corresponds to a ‘‘swamping’’ of the signal activity by that of the masker, rather than a suppression of the low‐level signal to its absolute threshold. To explain the fact that PTCs in forward masking are sharper than those in simultaneous masking, the model requires that suppression acts to sharpen the excitation pattern of the masker. This sharpening is not seen in simultaneous masking, since suppression in a given frequency region affects both signal and masker.This publication has 7 references indexed in Scilit:
- Contralateral and ipsilateral cueing in forward maskingThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1982
- Intensive and temporal effects in pure-tone forward maskingThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1979
- Psychophysical tuning curves: Restricting the listening band to the signal regionThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1979
- Simultaneous pure-tone masking: The dependence of masking asymmetries on intensityThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1978
- Psychophysical tuning curves measured in simultaneous and forward maskingThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1978
- Pure-Tone MaskingThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1959
- Differential Intensity Sensitivity of the Ear for Pure TonesPhysical Review B, 1928