Of Markets And Martyrs: Is It OK To Pay Well For Care?
- 1 January 1999
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Feminist Economics
- Vol. 5 (3) , 43-59
- https://doi.org/10.1080/135457099337806
Abstract
If caring work were well paid, would it lose some of the special, emotional, interpersonal aspects we want in "real" care relationships? Some fear that the introduction of "market values" would lead to such an outcome. This article seeks to bring to light some logical fallacies and insufficiently expunged gender dualisms that may lie, unexamined, under such concerns. Examining the ways we think and talk about markets, meanings, and motivations, it argues that the foci of feminist concern should instead be the concrete structures of caregiving and the problem of under-demand.Keywords
This publication has 7 references indexed in Scilit:
- Institutions and morale: the crowding-out effectPublished by Cambridge University Press (CUP) ,1998
- Did Father know best? Families, markets, and the supply of caring laborPublished by Cambridge University Press (CUP) ,1998
- Love and money: A comment on the markets debateFeminist Economics, 1996
- The Social Meaning of MoneyReis: Revista Española de Investigaciones Sociológicas, 1996
- "Holding hands at midnight": The paradox of caring laborFeminist Economics, 1995
- Gender, Cash and Informal Care: European Perspectives and DilemmasJournal of Social Policy, 1995
- Beyond Economic ManPublished by University of Chicago Press ,1993