Effect of a Pediatric Hospitalist System on Housestaff Education and Experience
Open Access
- 1 September 2002
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Medical Association (AMA) in Archives of Pediatrics & Adolescent Medicine
- Vol. 156 (9) , 877-883
- https://doi.org/10.1001/archpedi.156.9.877
Abstract
Objective To determine the effect of a pediatric hospitalist system on housestaff education and experience. Setting Free-standing academic children's hospital. Hospitalists were introduced in June 24, 1998, to supervise teaching and care on the general pediatric wards. Methods On 2 surveys, housestaff rated their skills, knowledge, and experiences on the wards (experiences survey), and the quality of teaching and supervision by attending physicians (attending survey). Responses before and after the introduction of the hospitalist system were compared using Wilcoxon nonparametric tests. Results Seventy-six (70%) of the 109 interns and 54 (62%) of the 87 senior residents responded to the experiences survey. Following introduction of the hospitalist system, the interns' mean overall rating of the general pediatrics wards rose from 4.1 to 4.7 on a 5-point Likert scale (P= .01). Their ratings of comparison rotations did not change significantly. Interns' satisfaction with the educational experience (3.2 to 3.5 of a 4-point Likert scale,P<.05), supervision, and quality of life on the pediatrics wards also improved significantly, as did their self-assessments of skills and knowledge related to general pediatrics training. Senior residents' ratings were generally unchanged. Three hundred seventy-one (63%) of the 593 attending physicians' surveys were completed. Compared with nonhospitalist attendings, hospitalists were rated more effective role models (4.7 vs 4.5 points,P<.05) and teachers (4.7 vs 4.4 points,P<.01). They were rated more knowledgeable (4.8 vs 4.5 of 5,P<.001) and accessible (4.7 vs 4.5 points,P<.05), involved housestaff more in the learning process (4.7 vs 4.4 points,P<.05), and gave better feedback (4.5 vs 4.2 points,P<.01). Hospitalists' bedside teaching, however, was rated lower (3.7 vs 4.2 points,P<.001). Conclusions Overall, hospitalists were rated significantly higher as educators than were traditional attending physicians. Introduction of a hospitalist system was associated with improved intern experience and quality of life on general pediatrics wards, and with improved self-reported skills and knowledge in general pediatrics.Keywords
This publication has 12 references indexed in Scilit:
- Pediatric Hospitalists in Canada and the United States: A Survey of Pediatric Academic Department ChairsAcademic Pediatrics, 2001
- The Presence of Hospitalists in Medical EducationAcademic Medicine, 2000
- Effects of hospitalists on cost, outcomes, and patient satisfaction in a rural health systemThe American Journal of Medicine, 2000
- Establishing a Pediatric Hospitalist Program at an Academic Medical CenterClinical Pediatrics, 2000
- The role of hospitalists in medical education.The American Journal of Medicine, 1999
- Implementation of a Hospitalist System in a Large Health Maintenance Organization: The Kaiser Permanente ExperienceAnnals of Internal Medicine, 1999
- The Impact of Hospitalists on Medical Education and the Academic Health SystemAnnals of Internal Medicine, 1999
- The Hospitalist Movement and Its Implications for the Care of Hospitalized ChildrenPublished by American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) ,1999
- Attributes of Excellent Attending-Physician Role ModelsNew England Journal of Medicine, 1998
- The Effect of Full-Time Faculty Hospitalists on the Efficiency of Care at a Community Teaching HospitalAnnals of Internal Medicine, 1998