A Randomized Study Comparing a Patient-Directed Hypertension Management Strategy With Usual Office-Based Care
Open Access
- 1 January 1997
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in American Journal of Hypertension
- Vol. 10 (1) , 58-67
- https://doi.org/10.1016/s0895-7061(96)00305-6
Abstract
This study aimed to compare the efficacy of a patient-directed management strategy with office-based management in maintaining blood pressure control in patients with chronic stable hypertension using a randomized trial of two months duration. The subjects had chronic stable essential hypertension without secondary causes or unstable cardiovascular disease and were selected through the offices of 11 family physicians and a tertiary care hypertension research unit. Patients were randomly assigned (2:1 ratio) to either a patient-directed management strategy using home blood pressure monitoring to adjust drug therapy if readings consistently exceeded defined limits, or office-based management through physician visits. The primary endpoint was the change from baseline in mean arterial pressure as determined by automatic ambulatory blood pressure monitoring. Secondary endpoints were changes in compliance, quality of life, and health care resource use. Ninety-one potential subjects were screened and 31 were randomized. Subjects in the patient-directed management group employed the drug adjustment protocols appropriately without complications. A significant difference in change in mean blood pressure was observed, favoring the patient-directed management (−0.95 mm Hg and +1.90 mm Hg, respectively, for patient-directed management and office-based management, P = .039). Compliance rates and quality of life scores were not significantly different between groups. Physician visits were more frequent in the patient-directed management group (1.05 v 0.20 visits/8 weeks, respectively, for patient-directed management and office-based management groups, P = .045). A patient-directed hypertensive management strategy may be feasible for patients with chronic stable hypertension. Such a strategy may improve blood pressure control compared with usual office-based care. However, physician visits may be increased using this strategy, at least in the short term. © 1997 American Journal of Hypertension, Ltd. Am J Hypertens 1997;10:58–67Keywords
This publication has 16 references indexed in Scilit:
- SOME IMPLICATIONS OF THE DIFFERENCES BETWEEN HOME, CLINIC AND AMBULATORY BLOOD-PRESSURE IN NORMOTENSIVE AND HYPERTENSIVE PATIENTS1989
- Prevalence and accuracy of home sphygmomanometers in an urban population.American Journal of Public Health, 1987
- Long-term effects of a complex behavioral treatment of essential hypertension.Psychosomatic Medicine, 1987
- What is the value of home blood pressure measurement in patients with mild hypertension?Hypertension, 1984
- A controlled trial of health education in the physician's officePreventive Medicine, 1984
- Understanding and Improving Patient ComplianceAnnals of Internal Medicine, 1984
- The prognostic value of ambulatory blood pressuresJAMA, 1983
- Comparison of clinic and home blood pressure levels in essential hypertension and variables associated with clinic-home differencesJournal of Chronic Diseases, 1980
- SELF-RECORDING OF BLOOD-PRESSURE IN MANAGEMENT OF HYPERTENSION1978
- IMPROVEMENT OF MEDICATION COMPLIANCE IN UNCONTROLLED HYPERTENSIONThe Lancet, 1976