“Half‐Way” Venous Catheters
- 1 September 1985
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica
- Vol. 29 (s81) , 32-35
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1399-6576.1985.tb02322.x
Abstract
In order to develop a “half‐way” venous catheter for clinical use, anthropometric (n = 200), radiographic (n = 101), and phlebographic (n = 44) investigations were undertaken to determine the lengths, diameters, and morphology of the basilic and cephalic veins from fossa cubiti to the lateral edge of the first rib. The lengths of basilic and cephalic veins varied from 25 to 45 cm, exceeding 40 cm in approximately 5% of cases. Catheter lengths to be inserted were correlated (“r” = 0.6–0.7) with body heights, accurately estimated by 1/5 of the body height (cm) plus 2 cm for the basilic vein, and 4 cm for the cephalic vein. The cephalic veins have small proximal end diameters (mean = 6 mm), and present terminal arches of 2–3 cm. These are connected by a rich anastomotic network to the superficial cervical veins. The basilico‐axillary courses are regular with gradually increasing diameters (mean = 16 mm), but in some observations, with the arms maximally abducted, the axillary veins presented accentuated folds. With these considerations, we recommend the insertion of the “half‐way” catheters by basilic approach with the patient's arm in 90d̀ abduction. The axillosubclavian length (mean = 18.5 cm) ensures wide limits for accurate placement of the “half‐way” catheter tips when a basilic approach is used. Further, their large diameters (16–19 mm) make flotation of the soft catheters probable.Keywords
This publication has 9 references indexed in Scilit:
- Estimation of central venous pressure by measurement of proximal axillary venous pressure using a “half-way” catheterActa Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica, 1986
- “Half‐Way” Venous CathetersActa Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica, 1985
- “Half‐Way” Venous CathetersActa Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica, 1985
- “Half‐Way” Venous CathetersActa Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica, 1985
- Material thrombogenicity in central venous catheterization: a comparison between soft, antebrachial catheters of silicone elastomer and polyurethaneJournal of Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition, 1984
- Material Thrombogenicity in Central Venous Catheterization III. A Comparison Between Soft Polyvinylchloride and Soft Polyurethane Elastomer, Long, Antebrachial CathetersActa Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica, 1984
- Material Thrombogenicity in Central Venous Catheterization II. A Comparison between Plain Silicone Elastomer, and Plain Polyethylene, Long, Antebrachial CathetersActa Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica, 1983
- Material Thrombogenicity in Central Venous Catheterization I. A Comparison Between Uncoated and Heparin‐Coated, Long Antebrachial, Polyethylene CathetersActa Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica, 1982
- Applied StatisticsPublished by Springer Nature ,1982