Prophylaxis of Radiation-Associated Mucositis in Conventionally Treated Patients With Head and Neck Cancer: A Double-Blind, Phase III, Randomized, Controlled Trial Evaluating the Clinical Efficacy of an Antimicrobial Lozenge Using a Validated Mucositis Scoring System
- 1 October 2002
- journal article
- clinical trial
- Published by American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) in Journal of Clinical Oncology
- Vol. 20 (19) , 3956-3963
- https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2002.05.046
Abstract
PURPOSE: Mucositis occurs in almost all patients treated with radiotherapy for head and neck cancer. The aim of this multicenter, double-blind, prospective, randomized trial was to evaluate the clinical efficacy of an economically viable antimicrobial lozenge (bacitracin, clotrimazole, and gentamicin [BcoG]) in the alleviation of radiation-induced mucositis in patients with head and neck cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: One hundred thirty-seven eligible patients were randomized to treatment with either antimicrobial lozenge (69 patients) or placebo lozenge (68 patients). The primary end point of the study was the time to development of severe mucositis from the start of radiotherapy. Secondary end points included severity and duration of mucositis, pain measurement, radiation therapy interruption, and quality of life. Mucositis was scored using a validated mucositis scoring system. RESULTS: Toxicity profiles were similar between the two arms of the study. The median time to development of severe mucositis from the start of radiotherapy was 3.61 weeks on BCoG and 3.96 weeks on placebo (P = .61). There were no statistically significant differences between the arms in the extent of severe mucositis as measured by physician, in oral toxicities as recorded by patients, or in radiotherapy delays. CONCLUSION: This study was conducted on the basis of a pilot study that demonstrated the BCoG lozenge to be tolerable and microbiologically efficacious. A validated mucositis scoring system was used. However, in this group of patients treated with conventional radiotherapy, the lozenge did not impact significantly on the severity of mucositis. Whether such a lozenge would be beneficial in treatment situations where rate of severe mucositis is higher (ie, in patients treated with unconventional fractionation or with concomitant chemotherapy) is unknown.Keywords
This publication has 47 references indexed in Scilit:
- Oral Mucositis and the Clinical and Economic Outcomes of Hematopoietic Stem-Cell TransplantationJournal of Clinical Oncology, 2001
- Acute oral pain and mucositis in bone marrow transplant and leukemia patients: Data from a pilot studyCancer Nursing, 1998
- Risk factors associated with mucositis in cancer patients receiving 5-fluorouracilOral Oncology, 1998
- Radiation therapy and pain in patients with head and neck cancerOral Oncology, 1993
- Management of orofacial pain in cancer patientsOral Oncology, 1993
- Colonisation index of the oral cavity: A novel technique for monitoring colonisation defenceMicrobial Ecology in Health & Disease, 1989
- The effect of chlorhexidine and benzydamine mouthwashes on mucositis induced by therapeutic irradiationClinical Radiology, 1988
- Candida infections in patients with acute leukemia: Ineffectiveness of nystatin prophylaxis and relationship between oropharyngeal and systemic candidiasisCancer, 1982
- The Radiobiological Basis for Tissue Reactions in the Oral Cavity Following Therapeutic X-Irradiation: A ReviewJAMA Otolaryngology–Head & Neck Surgery, 1982
- The effect of chlorhexidine mouthrinses on the human oral floraJournal of Periodontal Research, 1970