Comparison of pseudoephedrine and triprolidine, alone and in combination in preventing nasal congestion in subjects with allergic rhinitis using nasal histamine challenge.
Open Access
- 26 July 1984
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology
- Vol. 18 (1) , 86-89
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2125.1984.tb05026.x
Abstract
The abilities of triprolidine 2.5 mg and pseudoephedrine 60 mg, alone and in combination, to protect against an increase in nasal airway resistance (NAR) after histamine challenge were determined in eighteen individuals with grass pollen allergy. The study was conducted outside the pollen season using a double-blind, placebo controlled crossover design. The prior administration of pseudoephedrine 60 mg and triprolidine 2.5 mg alone or in combination was superior to placebo in reducing the increase in NAR after challenge with 1.0% histamine. However, such NAR measurements did not differentiate between pseudoephedrine 60 mg and triprolidine 2.5 mg administered alone or in combination. Challenge with 0.1% histamine failed to discriminate between any of the test medications.Keywords
This publication has 4 references indexed in Scilit:
- A Double-Blind Controlled Evaluation of Actifed® and its Individual Constituents in Allergic RhinitisJournal of International Medical Research, 1982
- Dose‐response study of the nasal decongestant and cardiovascular effects of pseudoephedrine.British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, 1980
- Use of Anterior Rhinometry in Nasal Provocation Challenges with Allergen and Evaluation of the Effects of Ketotifen, Clemastine and Sodium Cromoglycate on these ResponsesRespiration, 1980
- Histamine challenge and anterior nasal rhinometry: their use in the assessment of pseudoephedrine and triprolidine as nasal decongestants in subjects with hayfever.Published by Wiley ,1978