Electrode discrimination and speech recognition in postlingually deafened adult cochlear implant subjects
- 1 December 1997
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Acoustical Society of America (ASA) in The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
- Vol. 102 (6) , 3673-3685
- https://doi.org/10.1121/1.420401
Abstract
This study investigated the relationship between electrode discrimination and speech recognition in 11 postlingually deafened adult cochlear implant subjects who were implanted with the Nucleus/Cochlear Corporation multichannel device. The discriminability of each electrode included in a subject’s clinical map was measured using adaptive and fixed-level discrimination tasks. Considerable variability in electrode discriminability was observed across subjects. Two subjects could discriminate all electrodes, and discrimination performance by the remaining nine subjects varied from near perfect to very poor. In these nine subjects, the results obtained from the discrimination tasks were used to create a map that contained only discriminable electrodes, and subjects’ performance on speech recognition tasks using this experimental map was measured. Four different speech recognition tests were administered: a nine-choice closed-set medial vowel recognition task, a 14-choice closed-set medial consonant recognition task, the NU6 Monosyllabic Words Test [T. W. Tillman and T. Carhart, Tech. Rep. No. SAM-TR-66-55, USAF School of Aerospace Medicine, Brooks Air Force Base, Texas (1966)] scored for both words and phonemes correct, and the Central Institute for the Deaf (CID) Everyday Sentences test [H. Davis and S. R. Silverman, Hearing and Deafness (Holt, Rinehart, and Winston, New York, 1978)]. Seven of the nine subjects tested with the experimental map showed significant improvement on at least one speech recognition measure, even though the experimental map contained fewer electrodes than the original map. Three subjects’ scores improved significantly on the CID Everyday Sentences test, three subjects’ scores improved significantly on the NU6 Monosyllabic Words test, and five subjects’ scores improved significantly on the NU6 Monosyllabic Words test scored for phonemes correct. None of the subjects’ scores improved significantly on either the vowel or consonant tests. No significant correlation was observed between electrode discrimination ability and speech recognition scores or between electrode discrimination ability and improvement in speech recognition scores when programmed with the experimental map. The results of this study suggest that electrode discrimination tasks may be used to improve speech recognition of some cochlear implant subjects, and that each electrode site does not necessarily provide perceptually distinct information.Keywords
This publication has 10 references indexed in Scilit:
- Electrode ranking of ‘‘place pitch’’ and speech recognition in electrical hearingThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1995
- Electrode discrimination measures: Relationship with speech perception and clinical applicability of resultsThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1994
- Pitch perception for different modes of stimulation using the Cochlear multiple-electrode prosthesisThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1994
- The Histopathology of the Human Temporal Bone and Auditory Central Nervous System Following Cochlear Implantation in a Patient:Correlation with Psychophysics and Speech Perception ResultsActa Oto-Laryngologica, 1988
- Pitch perception by cochlear implant subjectsThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1987
- Absolute identification of electric pulse rates and electrode positions by cochlear implant patientsThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1985
- Multichannel electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve in man. I. Basic psychophysicsHearing Research, 1983
- Psychophysical studies for two multiple-channel cochlear implant patientsThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1982
- Psychophysical and speech perception studies on two multiple channel cochlear implant patientsThe Journal of Laryngology & Otology, 1980
- An adaptive procedure for subjective judgmentsPerception & Psychophysics, 1980