How shall they be judged? Notes and sources on assessment
- 1 April 1981
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Journal of Geography in Higher Education
- Vol. 5 (1) , 61-72
- https://doi.org/10.1080/03098268108708791
Abstract
Various obstacles to changing assessment procedures are built in to the structure of many higher education institutions. Three views of examinations are: radical (wanting to see the current system abolished), conservative (wanting to see it preserved), and liberal (wanting to see it reformed). In considering how examinations can be changed, five dimensions of assessment are presented: complexity, weighting, time allowed, task distribution over time and predictability. It is important to specify objectives, for only then can assessment have logical meaning, but they should not be too rigid, trivial or over‐constraining. Students should be more involved in the assessment procedure. Profile assessment seems a good idea.Keywords
This publication has 21 references indexed in Scilit:
- Portraits on a piece of stringStudies in Higher Education, 1980
- The role of assessment in the design of a curriculum for a degree in geographyJournal of Geography in Higher Education, 1978
- Aims and objectives in degree curriculum designJournal of Geography in Higher Education, 1978
- ASSESSING STUDENTS’ PARTICIPATION IN CLASS DISCUSSIONAssessment in Higher Education, 1978
- Problems arising from the use of continuous assessment for degree classificationJournal of Geography in Higher Education, 1977
- ARTS ASSESSMENT : WHO CHEATS? WHO CARES?Assessment in Higher Education, 1975
- WHAT IS ASSESSMENT?Assessment in Higher Education, 1975
- Some Preliminary Data on the Use of Self-Evaluations and Peer Ratings in Assigning University Course GradesThe Journal of Educational Research, 1969
- The Educational Objectives Of High School GeographyJournal of Geography, 1968
- ACADEMIC PERFORMANCE AT UNIVERSITYEducational Review, 1964