Pathogenic role of interleukin-6 in the development of sepsis. Part II: Significance of anti-interleukin-6 and anti-soluble interleukin-6 receptor-α antibodies in a standardized murine contact burn model
- 1 May 2003
- journal article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Critical Care Medicine
- Vol. 31 (5) , 1495-1501
- https://doi.org/10.1097/01.ccm.0000065725.80882.bd
Abstract
The in vivo effects of anti-interleukin-6 (anti-IL-6) and anti-interleukin-6-alpha receptor (anti-IL-6R) monoclonal antibodies on immune response and survival rate of a burn with subsequent infection were assessed. Ten-week-old C 57 BL/6J mice received a standardized contact burn; 48 hrs later endotoxin (LPS) was injected intraperitoneally to induce systemic inflammation. Ten different groups were studied. Groups I-IV sustained a burn and/or a LPS-stimulus but did not receive any anti-cytokines and served as controls. Treatment groups V-X sustained the same injuries but also received anti-IL-6 and anti-IL-6R intravenously either before or after the LPS stimulus. In a further part of the study, a lethal dose of LPS was injected (LPS-LD(100) group) followed by an injection of anti-IL-6 antibody and/or anti-IL-6R antibody. Serum concentrations of IL-6, tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-alpha, interferon (IFN)-gamma, and white blood cell and platelet counts were determined, and the survival rate over a 2-wk period was assessed. Treatment with anti-IL-6 slightly decreased the inflammatory response when it was given before or after LPS application. The inflammatory response was not decreased after treatment with anti-IL-6R. In the groups that received a combination of anti-IL-6 and anti-IL-6R, there was a significant reduction of the inflammatory response. This was more pronounced when the anti-cytokines were applied after LPS application. A significant reduction in mortality could be shown with both antibodies in the treatment groups and the groups that had received a lethal dose of LPS (LPS-LD(100) group). IL-6 has a low inflammatory potential, and IL-6R has no inflammatory potential by itself. In contrast, the IL-6/IL-6R complexes have a higher inflammatory potential. Mortality could be reduced by each antibody alone as well as by the combination, supporting the hypothesis that the inflammatory and lethal potentials of IL-6 are not identical. The study suggests that the use of antibodies against IL-6 or IL-6R is effective in the prevention of systemic inflammation in a murine burn model.Keywords
This publication has 24 references indexed in Scilit:
- Pathogenesis of Fever in a Rat Burn ModelJournal of Burn Care & Rehabilitation, 1997
- Plasma cytokine levels in patients with severe burn injury-with reference to the relationship between infection and prognosisBurns, 1996
- Serum cytokine levels (IL-4, IL-6, IL-8, G-CSF, GM-CSF) in burned patientsBurns, 1995
- Circulating Interleukin-6 Receptor in Patients with Sepsis SyndromeThe Journal of Infectious Diseases, 1995
- Effects of Antimurine Interleukin-6 on Bacterial Translocation During Gut-Derived SepsisArchives of Surgery, 1994
- CYTOKINE RESPONSE TO BURN INJURYPublished by Wolters Kluwer Health ,1994
- Systemic Production of Interleukin-6 Following Acute InflammationBiochemical and Biophysical Research Communications, 1993
- PLASMA CYTOKINES FOLLOWING THERMAL INJURY AND THEIR RELATIONSHIP WITH PATIENT MORTALITY, BURN SIZE, AND TIME POSTBURNPublished by Wolters Kluwer Health ,1993
- Interleukin 6—A Potential Mediator of Lethal Sepsis After Major Thermal Trauma: Evidence for Increased IL-6 Production by Peripheral Blood Mononuclear CellsPublished by Wolters Kluwer Health ,1991
- Increased levels of circulating interleukin 6 in burn patientsClinical Immunology and Immunopathology, 1990