Large differences in obstetrical intervention rates among Dutch hospitals, even after adjustment for population differences
- 1 September 1996
- journal article
- Published by Elsevier in European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology
- Vol. 68, 97-103
- https://doi.org/10.1016/0301-2115(96)02506-7
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 13 references indexed in Scilit:
- Provider-associated factors in obstetric interventionsEuropean Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, 1995
- Trends in caesarean section rates among high- and medium-risk pregnancies in the Netherlands 1983–1992European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, 1995
- How to compare and report department specific mortality rates for peer review using the Perinatal Database of The NetherlandsEuropean Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, 1994
- Differences in obstetrical intervention rates between Dutch hospitalsEuropean Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, 1994
- Obstetric characteristics profiles as quality assessment of obstetric careEuropean Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, 1993
- Home Births and Minimal Medical InterventionsPublished by American Medical Association (AMA) ,1990
- International Differences in the Use of Obstetric InterventionsJAMA, 1990
- Using logistic regression in perinatal epidemiology: an introduction for clinical researchers. Part 1: basic conceptsPaediatric and Perinatal Epidemiology, 1990
- Cesarean section: The House of Home revisitedAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1989
- Cesarean section and perinatal outcome: Response from the House of HorneAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1988