Nonadenomatous Polyps at CT Colonography: Prevalence, Size Distribution, and Detection Rates
- 1 September 2004
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Radiological Society of North America (RSNA) in Radiology
- Vol. 232 (3) , 784-790
- https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2323031614
Abstract
To prospectively investigate with computed tomographic (CT) colonography the prevalence and size distribution of nonadenomatous polyps in asymptomatic adults and to compare the detection rates of adenomatous and nonadenomatous polyps. A total of 1233 asymptomatic adults (mean age, 57.8 years; 505 women, 728 men) underwent same-day CT colonography and optical colonoscopy procedures. CT colonoscopy studies were interpreted prospectively with a primary three-dimensional approach immediately before optical colonoscopy. Statistical analysis was performed with the chi(2) test. Size, prevalence, and by-polyp detection differences were compared between adenomatous and nonadenomatous polyps. Seven hundred fifty-six (57.7%) colorectal polyps identified at optical colonoscopy in 410 (33.3%) patients were nonadenomatous; of these lesions, 622 (82.3%) were diminutive (</=5 mm). Nonadenomatous polyps accounted for 622 (64.4%) of 966 diminutive lesions and 134 (39.9%) of 344 polyps 6 mm or larger (P <.001). The prevalence rate for nonadenomatous polyps was 8.8% (109 of 1233 patients) and 2.0% (25 of 1233 patients) at 6- and 10-mm thresholds, respectively. CT colonography by-polyp sensitivity for nonadenomatous lesions was 73.1% (98 of 134 patients) and 73.3% (22 of 30 patients) at 6- and 10-mm thresholds, respectively, compared with 85.7% (180 of 210 patients) and 92.2% (47 of 51 patients) for adenomas (P <.01). In 1065 patients that did not have a 6-mm or larger adenoma at optical colonoscopy, CT colonography depicted a nonadenomatous polyp that was 6 mm or larger in 63 (5.9%) patients and a nonadenomatous polyp that was 10 mm or larger in 15 (1.4%) patients. More than 80% of nonadenomatous polyps were diminutive, but they accounted for nearly 40% of polyps that were 6 mm or larger. Fortunately, CT colonography is significantly (P <.01) less sensitive in the detection of lesions that have no malignant potential when compared with similar-sized adenomas that have malignant potential.Keywords
This publication has 16 references indexed in Scilit:
- Computed Tomographic Colonography (Virtual Colonoscopy)JAMA, 2004
- Computed Tomographic Virtual Colonoscopy to Screen for Colorectal Neoplasia in Asymptomatic AdultsNew England Journal of Medicine, 2003
- By-Patient Performance Characteristics of CT Colonography: Importance of Polyp Size Threshold Data [letter]Radiology, 2003
- Electronic Cleansing and Stool Tagging in CT Colonography: Advantages and Pitfalls with Primary Three-Dimensional EvaluationAmerican Journal of Roentgenology, 2003
- Prospective blinded evaluation of computed tomographic colonography for screen detection of colorectal polypsGastroenterology, 2003
- Virtual colonoscopy: past, present,and futureRadiologic Clinics of North America, 2003
- American Cancer Society Guidelines for the Early Detection of Cancer, 2003CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians, 2003
- Clinical Relevance of the Small Colorectal PolypEndoscopy, 2001
- Is in vivo measurement of size of polyps during colonoscopy accurate?Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, 1997
- Prevention of Colorectal Cancer by Colonoscopic PolypectomyNew England Journal of Medicine, 1993