Differential Susceptibility of Anthurium Cultivars to Bacterial Blight in Foliar and Systemic Infection Phases
Open Access
- 1 July 1998
- journal article
- Published by Scientific Societies in Plant Disease
- Vol. 82 (7) , 800-806
- https://doi.org/10.1094/pdis.1998.82.7.800
Abstract
Susceptibility of anthurium cultivars to systemic infection by the bacterial blight pathogen, Xanthomonas campestris pv. dieffenbachiae, was examined using a bioengineered bioluminescent strain (V108LRUH1) and compared with susceptibility to foliar infection. Eight cultivars with different levels of susceptibility to foliar infection were evaluated for their susceptibility to systemic infection. Petioles of second youngest leaves cut near the main stem were inoculated with strain V108LRUH1, and subsequent movement of this bacterium into other petioles was monitored by observing bioluminescence from the plants. The actual extent of systemic movement was determined by reisolating V108LRUH1 from dissected segments of the remaining petioles. In susceptible cultivars, the pathogen advanced very rapidly and nearly reached the distal end of petioles. In resistant cultivars, the pathogen was detected in none (or very few) of the petiole segments. However, the susceptibility ranking among the tested cultivars for systemic infection did not always correspond to the ranking determined for foliar infection: i.e., one cultivar that was susceptible to foliar infection was highly resistant to systemic infection, and vice versa. This suggests that cultivar susceptibility of anthuriums to bacterial blight may differ depending on the phase of disease progression, and thus evaluation for both disease phases is essential for complete understanding of cultivar susceptibility.Keywords
This publication has 14 references indexed in Scilit:
- Resistance gene-dependent plant defense responses.Plant Cell, 1996
- Latent infections of in vitro anthurium caused by Xanthomonas campestris pv. dieffenbachiaePlant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture (PCTOC), 1994
- Research NoteGrowth of BioluminescentXanthomonas campestrispv.campestrisin Susceptible and Resistant Host PlantsMolecular Plant-Microbe Interactions®, 1993
- Incompatible Interactions Between Crucifers andXanthomonas campestrisInvolve a Vascular Hypersensitive Response: Role of thehrpXLocusMolecular Plant-Microbe Interactions®, 1992
- Use of Monoclonal Antibodies and Pathogenicity Tests to Characterize Strains ofXanthomonas campestrispv.dieffenbachiaefrom AroidsPhytopathology®, 1992
- Race-specific resistance to Xanthomonas oryzae pv. oryzae conferred by bacterial blight resistance gene Xa-10 in rice (Oryza sativa) involves accumulation of a lignin-like substance in host tissuesPhysiological and Molecular Plant Pathology, 1991
- Direct Analysis of the Invasiveness of Xanthomonas Campestris Mutants Generated by Tn4431, A Transposon Containing A Promoterless Luciferase Cassette for Monitoring Gene ExpressionPublished by Springer Nature ,1987
- Development of a Vibrio Bioluminescence Gene–Set to Monitor Phytopathogenic Bacteria During the Ongoing Disease Process in a Non–Disruptive MannerNature Biotechnology, 1986
- Bacterial Leaf Spot of Cocoyam (Xanthosoma caracu), Incited byXanthomonas campestrispv.dieffenbachiae,in FloridaPlant Disease, 1985
- Selective Media for Isolation of Agrobacterium, Corynebacterium, Erwinia, Pseudomonas, and XanthomonasPhytopathology®, 1970