Should we screen for depression?
- 27 April 2006
- Vol. 332 (7548) , 1027-1030
- https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.332.7548.1027
Abstract
Depression screening as national health policy In the United States screening for common mental health problems is thought to be effective and is a cornerstone of the agenda to improve mental health; population level screening programmes are supported by the drug industry.7 w1 w2 Similar national programmes have been advocated in Australia.w3 In England and Wales, screening has been supported more cautiously by the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE), which recommends that it should be offered to people at high risk of depression.w4 Screening may become health policy in England and Wales, since primary care doctors will be rewarded for “enhanced services for depression” within the quality and outcomes framework (QOF), which will include a screening programme.w5 In the past screening programmes have been implemented without due consideration of their effectiveness, their ethical and clinical implications, and their impact on finite healthcare resources.8 w6 Consequently, the National Screening Committee has been established in the United Kingdom; this committee works to specific criteria to help ensure that screening “does more good than harm.”5 These criteria pertain to the condition, the test, the treatment, and the screening programme. Credit: PHOTOS.COMKeywords
This publication has 20 references indexed in Scilit:
- Screening and case finding instruments for depressionCochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 2005
- Effect of the addition of a “help” question to two screening questions on specificity for diagnosis of depression in general practice: diagnostic validity studyBMJ, 2005
- Diagnostic Errors of Primary Care Screens for Depression and Panic DisorderThe International Journal of Psychiatry in Medicine, 1999
- Cross sectional study of symptom attribution and recognition of depression and anxiety in primary care Commentary: There must be limits to the medicalisation of human distressBMJ, 1999
- False Positives, False Negatives, and the Validity of the Diagnosis of Major Depression in Primary CareArchives of Family Medicine, 1998
- The relationship of distress to mood disturbance in primary care and psychiatric populations.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 1997
- Twelve month outcome of depression in general practice: does detection or disclosure make a difference?BMJ, 1995
- Recognition, management, and outcomes of depression in primary careArchives of Family Medicine, 1995
- Prevalence, nature, and comorbidity of depressive disorders in primary careGeneral Hospital Psychiatry, 1994
- Mass screening: theory and ethics.BMJ, 1990