Does Work Group Cohesiveness Affect Individuals' Performance and Organizational Commitment?
- 1 August 1998
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Small Group Research
- Vol. 29 (4) , 472-494
- https://doi.org/10.1177/1046496498294004
Abstract
Using a cross-levelframework, the authors hypothesized that work group cohesiveness and perceived task competence would be associated with individual group members'performance and organizational commitment. Specifically, the authors tested whether perceived task competence was positively related to performance and organizational commitment and whether work group cohesiveness would explain variance in performance and organizational commitment beyond what was explained by perceived task competence. Four hundred and seventy-one Air Force and civilian employees representing 71 groups from several sites across the United States were used to test the hypotheses. Hierarchical linear modeling analyses produced support for the expected effects.Keywords
This publication has 45 references indexed in Scilit:
- What Makes Teams Work: Group Effectiveness Research from the Shop Floor to the Executive SuiteJournal of Management, 1997
- Composition, process, and performance in self-managed groups: The role of personality.Journal of Applied Psychology, 1997
- Organizational Images and Member IdentificationAdministrative Science Quarterly, 1994
- Feeling good-doing good: A conceptual analysis of the mood at work-organizational spontaneity relationship.Psychological Bulletin, 1992
- Five Years of Groups Research: What We Have Learned and What Needs to Be AddressedJournal of Management, 1991
- Understanding prosocial behavior, sales performance, and turnover: A group-level analysis in a service context.Journal of Applied Psychology, 1990
- Social Identity Theory and the OrganizationAcademy of Management Review, 1989
- Human agency in social cognitive theory.American Psychologist, 1989
- The Effects of Group Cohesion and Leader Behavior on Subordinate SatisfactionGroup & Organization Studies, 1986
- A variance explanation paradox: When a little is a lot.Psychological Bulletin, 1985