STIMULUS CLASS FORMATION AND STIMULUS—REINFORCER RELATIONS

Publisher Website
Google Scholar
Abstract
This study examined stimulus class membership established via stimulus—reinforcer relations. Mentally retarded subjects learned conditional discriminations with four two‐member sets of visual stimuli (A, B, C, and D). On arbitrary‐matching trials, they selected comparison stimuli B1 and B2 conditionally upon samples A1 and A2, respectively, and C1 and C2 conditionally upon B1 and B2, respectively. On identity‐matching trials, they selected all stimuli as comparisons conditionally upon identical stimuli as samples. Throughout training, correct selections of A1, B1, C1, and D1 were followed by one reinforcer, R1, and those of A2, B2, C2, and D2 were followed by another, R2. Subsequent tests documented the formation of two four‐member stimulus classes, A1‐B1‐C1‐D1 and A2‐B2‐C2‐D2. The class membership of the A, B, and C stimuli could have been based on equivalence relations that resulted from the arbitrary‐matching training. D1 and D2 had never appeared on arbitrary‐matching trials, however. Their class membership must have been based on relations with R1 and R2, respectively. Results thus confirm a previous finding that stimulus classes can be expanded via stimulus—reinforcer relations. They also define more precisely the potential nature of those classes and the conditions under which class membership can be established.

This publication has 22 references indexed in Scilit: