Locational returns to human capital: Minority access to suburban community resources
- 1 May 1993
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Duke University Press in Demography
- Vol. 30 (2) , 243-268
- https://doi.org/10.2307/2061840
Abstract
The suburbanization of racial and ethnic minorities is analyzed in terms of the locational resources provided by their communities of residence. In suburbs in the New York CMSA, non-Hispanic whites and Asians, on average, live in communities with higher average socioeconomic status, while Hispanics and blacks live in the less desirable suburbs. Models predicting suburban socioeconomic status for each racial/ethnic group show that whites and Hispanics receive consistent returns on income, acculturation, and family status. Asians’ locational patterns differ because they are unrelated to measures of acculturation; for blacks, locational outcomes correspond least to any of these human capital characteristics.Keywords
This publication has 22 references indexed in Scilit:
- American Apartheid: Segregation and the Making of the UnderclassAmerican Journal of Sociology, 1990
- Racial Identity Among Caribbean Hispanics: The Effect of Double Minority Status on Residential SegregationAmerican Sociological Review, 1989
- Race and WealthThe Review of Black Political Economy, 1989
- Suburbanization and Segregation in U.S. Metropolitan AreasAmerican Journal of Sociology, 1988
- The Racial Structuring of the Housing Market and Segregation in Suburban AreasSocial Forces, 1986
- Spatial Assimilation as a Socioeconomic OutcomeAmerican Sociological Review, 1985
- Processes of Hispanic and Black Spatial AssimilationAmerican Journal of Sociology, 1984
- The Stratification of Metropolitan Suburbs, 1960-1970American Sociological Review, 1981
- Race, Class, and Neighborhood: Differences in the Residential Return on Individual ResourcesSocial Forces, 1980
- Suburban Change and PersistenceAmerican Sociological Review, 1979