Innovations in Public Participation and Environmental Decision Making: Examples from the Great Lakes Region
- 1 October 2001
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Society & Natural Resources
- Vol. 14 (9) , 815-826
- https://doi.org/10.1080/089419201753210620
Abstract
Public participation has become a standard component of environmental decisionmaking processes. Frequently used methods of public involvement, such as public comments and hearings, however, are too of ten reactive in nature, involve insufficient deliberation, and engage only a small number of participants. This article describes a set of "innovative'' participatory processes-study circles, citizens juries, round tables, and collaborative watershed management efforts-and considers their relative strengths and weaknesses through the use of a common comparative framework. The analysis shows that these innovative processes off er some different and potentially valuable advantages relative to the public involvement methods commonly used today. While the processes standing alone are not likely to replace traditional methods, preliminary analysis suggests that they may be effective if applied strategically, and in combination with other innovative or traditional processes.Keywords
This publication has 4 references indexed in Scilit:
- The Citizens’ Jury Model of Public Participation: A Critical EvaluationPublished by Springer Nature ,1995
- Citizens Juries: One Solution for Difficult Environmental QuestionsPublished by Springer Nature ,1995
- Success of citizen advisory committees in consensus‐based water resources planning in the great lakes basinSociety & Natural Resources, 1993
- Public involvement in resource planning: Toward bridging the gap between policy and implementationSociety & Natural Resources, 1989