PHENOTYPIC LABILITY AND THE EVOLUTION OF PREDATOR-INDUCED PLASTICITY IN TADPOLES
- 1 February 2002
- Vol. 56 (2) , 361-370
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0014-3820.2002.tb01346.x
Abstract
The hypothesis that predator-induced defenses in anuran larvae are maintained by divergent selection across multiple predation environments has not been fully supported by empirical results. One reason may be that traits that respond slowly to environmental variation experience a fitness cost not incorporated in the standard adaptive model, due to a time lag between detecting the state of the environment and expressing the phenotypic response. I measured the rate at which behavior and morphology of Rana temporaria tadpoles change when confronted with a switch in the predation environment at two points in development. Hatchling tadpoles that had been exposed during the egg stage to Aeshna dragonfly larvae were not phenotypically different from those exposed as eggs to predator-free conditions, and both responded similarly to post-hatching predator treatments. When 25-day-old tadpoles from treatments with and without dragonflies were subjected to a switch in the environment, their activity budgets reversed completely within 24-36 h, and their body and tail shape began changing significantly within 4 days. The behavioral response was conservative: Tadpoles switched from high-risk to predator-free treatments were slower to adjust their activity. The study confirmed that behavioral traits are relatively labile and exhibit strong plasticity, but it did not reveal such a pattern at the level of individual traits: Morphological traits that developed slowly did not show the least plasticity. Thus, I found that differences in lability of traits were useful for predicting the magnitude of plasticity only for fundamentally different kinds of characters.Keywords
This publication has 39 references indexed in Scilit:
- Character Identification in Evolutionary Biology: The Role of the OrganismTheory in Biosciences, 2000
- Selection for phenotypic plasticity inRana sylvaticatadpolesBiological Journal of the Linnean Society, 1998
- Plastic inducible morphologies are not always adaptive: The importance of time delays in a stochastic environmentEvolutionary Ecology, 1996
- A Test of the Adaptive Plasticity Hypothesis Using Transgenic and Mutant Plants Disabled in Phytochrome-Mediated Elongation Responses to NeighborsThe American Naturalist, 1995
- The Evolution Of Aphid Life CyclesAnnual Review of Entomology, 1992
- Effects of body size, sibship, and tail injury on the susceptibility of tadpoles to dragonfly predationCanadian Journal of Zoology, 1990
- Developmental differences in visceral morphology of megophryine pelobatid tadpoles in relation to their body form and mode of lifeBiological Journal of the Linnean Society, 1989
- Phenotypic Plasticity And The Origins Of DiversityAnnual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 1989
- Asymmetrical Developmental Plasticity in an Intertidal SnailEvolution, 1988
- The genetic correlation between characters maintained by selection, linkage and inbreedingGenetics Research, 1984