Abstract
The problem of action selection has two components: what is selected and how is it selected? To understandwhatis selected, it is necessary to distinguish between behavioural and mechanistic levels of description. Animals do not choose between behavioursper se; rather, behaviour reflects interactions among brains, bodies and environments. To understand whatguidesselection, it is useful to take a normative perspective that evaluates behaviour in terms of a fitness metric. This perspective, rooted in behavioural ecology, can be especially useful for understanding apparently irrational choice behaviour. This paper describes a series of models that use artificial life (AL) techniques to address the above issues. We show that successful action selection can arise from the joint activity of parallel, loosely coupled sensorimotor processes. We define a class of AL models that help to bridge the ecological approaches of normative modelling and agent- or individual-based modelling (IBM). Finally, we show how an instance of apparently suboptimal decision making, the matching law, can be accounted for by adaptation to competitive foraging environments.

This publication has 80 references indexed in Scilit: