Stem Cell Mobilization
Open Access
- 1 January 2003
- journal article
- review article
- Published by American Society of Hematology in Hematology-American Society Hematology Education Program
- Vol. 2003 (1) , 419-437
- https://doi.org/10.1182/asheducation-2003.1.419
Abstract
Successful blood and marrow transplant (BMT), both autologous and allogeneic, requires the infusion of a sufficient number of hematopoietic progenitor/stem cells (HPCs) capable of homing to the marrow cavity and regenerating a full array of hematopoietic cell lineages in a timely fashion. At present, the most commonly used surrogate marker for HPCs is the cell surface marker CD34, identified in the clinical laboratory by flow cytometry. Clinical studies have shown that infusion of at least 2 × 106 CD34+ cells/kg recipient body weight results in reliable engraftment as measured by recovery of adequate neutrophil and platelet counts approximately 14 days after transplant. Recruitment of HPCs from the marrow into the blood is termed mobilization, or, more commonly, stem cell mobilization. In Section I, Dr. Tsvee Lapidot and colleagues review the wide range of factors influencing stem cell mobilization. Our current understanding focuses on chemokines, proteolytic enzymes, adhesion molecules, cytokines and stromal cell-stem cell interactions. On the basis of this understanding, new approaches to mobilization have been designed and are now starting to undergo clinical testing. In Section II, Dr. Michele Cottler-Fox describes factors predicting the ability to mobilize the older patient with myeloma. In addition, clinical approaches to improving collection by individualizing the timing of apheresis and adjusting the volume of blood processed to achieve a desired product are discussed. Key to this process is the daily enumeration of blood CD34+ cells. Newer methods of enumerating and mobilizing autologous blood HPCs are discussed. In Section III, Dr. John DiPersio and colleagues provide data on clinical results of mobilizing allogeneic donors with G-CSF, GM-CSF and the combination of both as relates to the number and type of cells collected by apheresis. Newer methods of stem cell mobilization as well as the relationship of graft composition on immune reconstitution and GVHD are discussed.Keywords
This publication has 95 references indexed in Scilit:
- Marrow versus peripheral blood for geno-identical allogeneic stem cell transplantation in acute myelocytic leukemia: influence of dose and stem cell source shows better outcome with rich marrowBlood, 2003
- Cell surface peptidase CD26/DPPIV mediates G-CSF mobilization of mouse progenitor cellsBlood, 2003
- Cleavage of p21 by Proteinase-3, a Myeloid-specific Serine Protease, Potentiates Cell ProliferationPublished by Elsevier ,2002
- Comparison of gene expression in CD34+ cells from bone marrow and G-CSF-mobilized peripheral blood by high-density oligonucleotide array analysisTransplantation and Cellular Therapy, 2001
- Autologous stem cell transplantation for non-Hodgkin's lymphoma: comparison of radiation-based and chemotherapy-only preparative regimensBone Marrow Transplantation, 2001
- Enumeration of HPC in mobilized peripheral blood with the Sysmex SE9500 predicts final CD34+ cell yield in the apheresis collectionBone Marrow Transplantation, 2000
- A randomised, prospective comparison of allogeneic bone marrow and peripheral blood progenitor cell transplantation in the treatment of haematological malignanciesBone Marrow Transplantation, 1998
- Impaired Production and Increased Apoptosis of Neutrophils in Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor Receptor–Deficient MiceImmunity, 1996
- Large-volume leukapheresis in pediatric patients: processing more blood diminishes the apparent magnitude of intra-apheresis recruitmentTransfusion, 1996
- Osteoporosis in severe congenital neutropenia treated with granulocyte colony‐stimulating factorBritish Journal of Haematology, 1995