Methodological Issues in the Measurement of Career Maturity
- 1 January 1974
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Measurement and Evaluation in Guidance
- Vol. 6 (4) , 200-209
- https://doi.org/10.1080/00256307.1974.12022599
Abstract
With the current emphasis on career education as well as the longer standing interest in career development theory and research, the measurement of career maturity throughout the life span—but particularly during adolescence—has assumed central importance in the operational definition and quantification of salient variables. But a psychometrics of career maturity, which poses several unique methodological problems, is only beginning to be formulated. At least three major issues in the assessment of career maturity need resolution: (a) linear versus nonlinear time functions in the selection of items; (b) longitudinal versus cross-sectional developmental data collection designs; and (c) maturational versus error variance in the estimation of test-retest reliability. These issues are discussed and provisional resolutions are proposed.Keywords
This publication has 14 references indexed in Scilit:
- Path analysis: Psychological examples.Psychological Bulletin, 1970
- Separating Reliability and Stability in Test-Retest CorrelationAmerican Sociological Review, 1969
- A Report on Three Growth Studies at the University of CaliforniaThe Gerontologist, 1967
- Path Analysis: Sociological ExamplesAmerican Journal of Sociology, 1966
- A general model for the study of developmental problems.Psychological Bulletin, 1965
- A model for the measurement of vocational maturity.Journal of Counseling Psychology, 1961
- Vocational self concept in adolescence.Journal of Counseling Psychology, 1959
- On the growth of intelligence.American Psychologist, 1955
- THE DIFFERENTIATION OF INTELLECTUAL ABILITYBritish Journal of Educational Psychology, 1954
- A developmental theory of intelligence.American Psychologist, 1946