Choice of Internal Mammary Artery or Saphenous Vein Graft for Myocardial Revascularization
- 1 January 1986
- journal article
- research article
- Published by S. Karger AG in Cardiology
- Vol. 73 (4-5) , 235-241
- https://doi.org/10.1159/000174017
Abstract
The saphenous vein has been the traditional conduit for elective myocardial revascularization. Although readily available and adaptable to many configurations around the heart, it is prone to intimal hyperplasia and vein graft atherosclerosis, which diminish long-term patency and relief of symptoms. The internal mammary artery graft represents a marked improvement over the saphenous vein graft in many respects. Data are presented comparing saphenous vein graft patency with that of the internal mammary artery, bilateral internal mammary artery, free internal mammary artery, and sequential internal mammary artery grafts.This publication has 6 references indexed in Scilit:
- Influence of the Internal-Mammary-Artery Graft on 10-Year Survival and Other Cardiac EventsNew England Journal of Medicine, 1986
- Left Thoracotomy for Reoperative Coronary Artery Bypass ProceduresThe Annals of Thoracic Surgery, 1985
- Long-term (5 to 12 years) serial studies of internal mammary artery and saphenous vein coronary bypass graftsThe Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, 1985
- SEQUENTIAL INTERNAL MAMMARY ARTERY GRAFTS - EXPANDED UTILIZATION OF AN IDEAL CONDUIT1985
- Multivessel Coronary Revascularization Without Saphenous Vein: Long-term Results of Bilateral Internal Mammary Artery GraftingThe Annals of Thoracic Surgery, 1983
- The practice of coronary artery bypass surgery in 1980The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, 1981