Peer review of grant applications: a harbinger for mediocrity in clinical research?
- 1 November 1996
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Elsevier in The Lancet
- Vol. 348 (9037) , 1293-1295
- https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(96)08029-4
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 10 references indexed in Scilit:
- Discovery and inventionInterdisciplinary Science Reviews, 1995
- The slowing of treatment discovery, 1965–1995Nature Medicine, 1995
- Essential fatty acid metabolism in boys with attention-deficit hyperactivity disorderThe American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 1995
- Plagiarism is worse than mere theftNature, 1995
- Does NIH Shortchange Clinicians?Science, 1994
- The Philosophical Basis of Peer Review and the Suppression of InnovationJAMA, 1990
- The grants gameNature, 1989
- A lack of essential fatty acids as a possible cause of hyperactivity in childrenMedical Hypotheses, 1981
- Personal ViewBMJ, 1974
- Referees and research administrators: barriers to scientific research?BMJ, 1974