Domain-Specific Data Sharing in Neuroscience: What Do We Have to Learn from Each Other?
- 13 May 2008
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Springer Nature in Neuroinformatics
- Vol. 6 (2) , 117-121
- https://doi.org/10.1007/s12021-008-9019-9
Abstract
Molecular biology and genomics have made notable strides in the sharing of primary data and resources. In other domains of neuroscience research, however, there has been resistance to adopting formalized strategies for data exchange, archiving, and availability. In this article, we discuss how neuroscience domains might follow the lead of molecular biology on what has been successful and what has failed in active data sharing. This considers not only the technical challenges but also the sociological concerns in making it possible. Though, not a pain-free process, with increased data availability, scientists from multiple fields can enjoy greater opportunity for novel discoveries about the brain in health and disease.Keywords
This publication has 42 references indexed in Scilit:
- Effect of Reversible Inactivation of Superior Colliculus on Head MovementsJournal of Neurophysiology, 2008
- Manually structured digital abstracts: A scaffold for automatic text miningFEBS Letters, 2008
- Role of the Primate Superior Colliculus in the Control of Head MovementsJournal of Neurophysiology, 2007
- NCBI GEO: mining tens of millions of expression profiles--database and tools updateNucleic Acids Research, 2006
- Data Sharing: How Much Doesn't Get Submitted to GenBank?PLoS Biology, 2006
- MIAME, we have a problemTrends in Genetics, 2006
- Gene expression microarray studies in polygenic psychiatric disorders: Applications and data analysisBrain Research Reviews, 2005
- Are the current ontologies in biology good ontologies?Nature Biotechnology, 2005
- Diffusion‐tensor MRI: theory, experimental design and data analysis – a technical reviewNMR in Biomedicine, 2002
- The Protein Data BankActa Crystallographica Section D-Biological Crystallography, 2002