Assessing the role of basic control measures, antivirals and vaccine in curtailing pandemic influenza: scenarios for the US, UK and the Netherlands
- 13 December 2006
- journal article
- research article
- Published by The Royal Society in Journal of The Royal Society Interface
- Vol. 4 (14) , 505-521
- https://doi.org/10.1098/rsif.2006.0186
Abstract
An increasing number of avian flu cases in humans, arising primarily from direct contact with poultry, in several regions of the world have prompted the urgency to develop pandemic preparedness plans worldwide. Leading recommendations in these plans include basic public health control measures for minimizing transmission in hospitals and communities, the use of antiviral drugs and vaccination. This paper presents a mathematical model for the evaluation of the pandemic flu preparedness plans of the United States (US), the United Kingdom (UK) and the Netherlands. The model is used to assess single and combined interventions. Using data from the US, we show that hospital and community transmission control measures alone can be highly effective in reducing the impact of a potential flu pandemic. We further show that while the use of antivirals alone could lead to very significant reductions in the burden of a pandemic, the combination of transmission control measures, antivirals and vaccine gives the most 'optimal' result. However, implementing such an optimal strategy at the onset of a pandemic may not be realistic. Thus, it is important to consider other plausible alternatives. An optimal preparedness plan is largely dependent on the availability of resources; hence, it is country-specific. We show that countries with limited antiviral stockpiles should emphasize their use therapeutically (rather than prophylactically). However, countries with large antiviral stockpiles can achieve greater reductions in disease burden by implementing them both prophylactically and therapeutically. This study promotes alternative strategies that may be feasible and attainable for the US, UK and the Netherlands. It emphasizes the role of hospital and community transmission control measures in addition to the timely administration of antiviral treatment in reducing the burden of a flu pandemic. The latter is consistent with the preparedness plans of the UK and the Netherlands. Our results indicate that for low efficacy and coverage levels of antivirals and vaccine, the use of a vaccine leads to the greatest reduction in morbidity and mortality compared with the singular use of antivirals. However, as these efficacy and coverage levels are increased, the use of antivirals is more effective.Keywords
This publication has 31 references indexed in Scilit:
- Priority Setting for Pandemic Influenza: An Analysis of National Preparedness PlansPLoS Medicine, 2006
- Strategies for mitigating an influenza pandemicNature, 2006
- Mitigation strategies for pandemic influenza in the United StatesProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2006
- Simple models for containment of a pandemicJournal of The Royal Society Interface, 2006
- Transmission dynamics of the great influenza pandemic of 1918 in Geneva, Switzerland: Assessing the effects of hypothetical interventionsJournal of Theoretical Biology, 2006
- Strategies for containing an emerging influenza pandemic in Southeast AsiaNature, 2005
- Assessment of the efficacy and effectiveness of influenza vaccines in healthy children: systematic reviewThe Lancet, 2005
- Transmissibility of 1918 pandemic influenzaNature, 2004
- Influenza-Associated Hospitalizations in the United StatesJAMA, 2004
- Pandemic Influenza and Healthcare Demand in the Netherlands: Scenario AnalysisEmerging Infectious Diseases, 2003