Upper Bounds for Kruskal's Stress
- 1 September 1984
- journal article
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) in Psychometrika
- Vol. 49 (3) , 391-402
- https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02306028
Abstract
In this paper the relationships between the two formulas for stress proposed by Kruskal in 1964 are studied. It is shown that stress formula one has a system of nontrivial upper bounds. It seems likely that minimization of this loss function will be liable to produce solutions for which this upper bound is small. These are regularly shaped configurations. Even though stress formula two yields less equivocal results, it seems to be expected that minimization of this loss function will tend to produce configurations in which the points are clumped. These results give no clue as to which of the two loss functions is to be preferred.Keywords
This publication has 19 references indexed in Scilit:
- The Difference Between “Several” and “Single”: A Reply to Spence and YoungPsychometrika, 1978
- Optimizing the arrangement of points on the unit sphereMathematics of Computation, 1977
- Re-Evaluation of Monte Carlo Studies in Nonmetric Multidimensional ScalingPsychometrika, 1976
- Extremal problems of distance geometry related to energy integralsTransactions of the American Mathematical Society, 1974
- Concerning Monte Carlo Evaluations of Nonmetric Multidimensional Scaling AlgorithmsPsychometrika, 1973
- On the sum of distances betweenn points on a sphereActa Mathematica Hungarica, 1972
- QUANTITATIVE INTERPRETATION OF STRESS IN KRUSKAL'S MULTIDIMENSIONAL SCALING TECHNIQUEBritish Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 1971
- A Monte Carlo Investigation of the Statistical Significance of Kruskal's Nonmetric Scaling ProcedurePsychometrika, 1969
- Multidimensional scaling by optimizing goodness of fit to a nonmetric hypothesisPsychometrika, 1964
- On the sum of distances determined by a pointsetActa Mathematica Hungarica, 1956