Information Disclosure, Cognitive Biases, and Payday Borrowing
Top Cited Papers
- 14 November 2011
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in The Journal of Finance
- Vol. 66 (6) , 1865-1893
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.2011.01698.x
Abstract
Can psychology‐guided information disclosure induce borrowers to lower their use of high‐cost debt? In a field experiment at payday stores, we find that information that makes people think less narrowly (over time) about finance costs results in less borrowing. In particular, reinforcing the adding‐up dollar fees incurred when rolling over loans reduces the take‐up of future payday loans by 11% in the subsequent 4 months. Although we remain agnostic as to the overall sufficiency of better disclosure policy to “remedy” payday borrowing, we cast the 11% reduction in borrowing in light of the relative low cost of this policy.This publication has 41 references indexed in Scilit:
- Your House or Your Credit Card, Which Would You Choose? Personal Delinquency Tradeoffs and Precautionary Liquidity MotivesSSRN Electronic Journal, 2010
- Your House or Your Credit Card, Which Would You Choose? Personal Delinquency Tradeoffs and Precautionary Liquidity MotivesSSRN Electronic Journal, 2010
- A conceptual and empirical examination of justifications for dichotomization.Psychological Methods, 2009
- Are Microcredit Interest Rates Excessive?SSRN Electronic Journal, 2009
- Payday Holiday: How Households Fare After Payday Credit BansSSRN Electronic Journal, 2008
- Financial Literacy and Retirement Planning: New Evidence from the Rand American Life PanelSSRN Electronic Journal, 2007
- How Much Should We Trust Differences-In-Differences Estimates?The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 2004
- The Response of Household Consumption to Income Tax RefundsAmerican Economic Review, 1999
- The Evaluability Hypothesis: An Explanation for Preference Reversals between Joint and Separate Evaluations of AlternativesOrganizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 1996
- Effects of Context and Part-Category Cues on Recall of Competing BrandsJournal of Marketing Research, 1985