A Comparison of Ankle Taping and a Semirigid Support
- 1 April 1983
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in The Physician and Sportsmedicine
- Vol. 11 (4) , 99-103
- https://doi.org/10.1080/00913847.1983.11708511
Abstract
In brief: The authors compare the effectiveness of taping using the Gibney basket weave and heel lock and a semirigid support constructed of thermoplastic material to restrict range of motion during inversion of the ankle. Twenty-nine subjects had one ankle taped and the other splinted. Three measurements of maximum active inversion range of motion were taken on both ankles: (1) presupport, (2) preexercise, and (3) postexercise. The subjects' active inversion range of motion was measured with the Leighton Flexometer. Preexercise and postexercise measurements for both taping and splinting showed no significant difference in retention of support. The findings of this study indicate that both methods of support are effective in restricting inversion range of motion.Keywords
This publication has 6 references indexed in Scilit:
- Air stirrup management of ankle injuries in the athleteThe American Journal of Sports Medicine, 1980
- A Functional Semirigid Support System for Ankle InjuriesThe Physician and Sportsmedicine, 1979
- The frequency of injury, mechanism of injury, and epidemiology of ankle sprains*The American Journal of Sports Medicine, 1977
- The prevention and treatment of ankle injuriesThe American Journal of Sports Medicine, 1976
- Ankle injuries in sports*The Journal of Sports Medicine, 1973
- The case against ankle tapingThe Journal of Sports Medicine, 1973