Docetaxel and Cisplatin With Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor (G-CSF) Versus MVAC With G-CSF in Advanced Urothelial Carcinoma: A Multicenter, Randomized, Phase III Study From the Hellenic Cooperative Oncology Group
- 15 January 2004
- journal article
- clinical trial
- Published by American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) in Journal of Clinical Oncology
- Vol. 22 (2) , 220-228
- https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2004.02.152
Abstract
The combination of methotrexate, vinblastine, doxorubicin, and cisplatin (MVAC) represents the standard regimen for inoperable or metastatic urothelial cancer, but its toxicity is significant. We previously reported a 52% response rate (RR) using a docetaxel and cisplatin (DC) combination. The toxicity of this regimen compared favorably with that reported for MVAC. We thus designed a randomized phase III trial to compare DC with MVAC. Patients with inoperable or metastatic urothelial carcinoma; adequate bone marrow, renal, liver, and cardiac function; and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status ≤ 2 were randomly assigned to receive MVAC at standard doses or docetaxel 75 mg/m2 and cisplatin 75 mg/m2 every 3 weeks. All patients received prophylactic granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) support. Two hundred twenty patients were randomly assigned (MVAC, 109 patients; DC, 111 patients). Treatment with MVAC resulted in superior RR (54.2% v 37.4%; P = .017), median time to progression (TTP; 9.4 v 6.1 months; P = .003) and median survival (14.2 v 9.3 months; P = .026). After adjusting for prognostic factors, difference in TTP remained significant (hazard ratio [HR], 1.61; P = .005), whereas survival difference was nonsignificant at the 5% level (HR, 1.31; P = .089). MVAC caused more frequent grade 3 or 4 neutropenia (35.4% v 19.2%; P = .006), thrombocytopenia (5.7% v 0.9%; P = .046), and neutropenic sepsis (11.6% v 3.8%; P = .001). Toxicity of MVAC was considerably lower than that previously reported for MVAC administered without G-CSF. MVAC is more effective than DC in advanced urothelial cancer. G-CSF-supported MVAC is well tolerated and could be used instead of classic MVAC as first-line treatment in advanced urothelial carcinoma.Keywords
This publication has 21 references indexed in Scilit:
- Long-term follow-up of a phase III intergroup study of cisplatin alone or in combination with methotrexate, vinblastine, and doxorubicin in patients with metastatic urothelial carcinoma: a cooperative group study.Journal of Clinical Oncology, 1997
- The treatment of advanced bladder cancerAnnals of Oncology, 1995
- A Phase II Study of Methotrexate, Vinblastine, Doxorubicin and Cisplatin Plus Recombinant Human Granulocyte-Macrophage Colony Stimulating Factors in Patients with Advanced Transitional Cell CarcinomaJournal of Urology, 1993
- Escalated M-VAC chemotherapy and recombinant human granulocyte-macrophage colony stimulating factor (rhGM-CSF) in patients with advanced urothelial tract tumorsAnnals of Oncology, 1993
- A randomized comparison of cisplatin alone or in combination with methotrexate, vinblastine, and doxorubicin in patients with metastatic urothelial carcinoma: a cooperative group study.Journal of Clinical Oncology, 1992
- A prospective randomized trial comparing MVAC and CISCA chemotherapy for patients with metastatic urothelial tumors.Journal of Clinical Oncology, 1990
- Methotrexate, vinblastine, doxorubicin, and cisplatin for advanced transitional cell carcinoma of the urothelium. Efficacy and patterns of response and relapseCancer, 1989
- Effect of Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor on Neutropenia and Associated Morbidity Due to Chemotherapy for Transitional-Cell Carcinoma of the UrotheliumNew England Journal of Medicine, 1988
- M-Vac (Methotrexate, Vinblastine, Doxorubicin and Cisplatin) for Advanced Transitional Cell Carcinoma of the UrotheliumJournal of Urology, 1988
- Preliminary Results of M-VAC (Methotrexate, Vinblastine, Doxorubicin and Cisplatin) for Transitional Cell Carcinoma of the UrotheliumJournal of Urology, 1985