Predictive Value of 18-Fluoro-Deoxy-Glucose-Positron Emission Tomography (18F-FDG-PET) in the Identification of Responders to Chemoradiation Therapy for the Treatment of Locally Advanced Esophageal Cancer
- 1 April 2006
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Annals of Surgery
- Vol. 243 (4) , 472-478
- https://doi.org/10.1097/01.sla.0000208430.07050.61
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate the utility of 18F-FDG-PET in predicting response to concomitant chemoradiation in locally-advanced esophageal cancer. Summary Background Data: Approximately 25% of esophageal cancer patients experience a pathologic complete response (pCR) to preoperative chemoradiation therapy. Computed tomography, endoscopy, and endoscopic ultrasound are unable to identify patients experiencing a pCR. Growing evidence supports the use of 18F-FDG-PET in the staging of esophageal cancer in its ability to detect occult metastatic and lymph nodal disease. The identification of patients with a pCR to chemoradiation could potentially spare those patients the morbidity associated with a resection. Methods: Eligibility criteria included T3-T4N0M0 or T1-T4N1M0 esophageal cancer. Patients underwent an initial 18F-FDG-PET before treatment and then repeated 4 to 6 weeks after chemoradiation, prior to the esophagectomy. Chemoradiation consisted of: cisplatinum, 5-fluorouracil, and radiation to a median dose of 50.4 Gy. Pathologic response was determined from a systematic review of the esophagectomy specimens. Results: Sixty-four patients have completed therapy to date. Response was as follows: pCR 27%, pathologic residual microscopic (pCRmicro) 14.5%, partial response 19%, and stable or progressive disease 39.5%. A pretreatment standardized uptake value (SUVmax1hour) ≥15 was associated with an observed 77.8% significant response (pCR + pCRmicro) compared with 24.2% for patients with a pretreatment SUVmax1hour P = 0.005). Significant response was observed in 71.4% of patients with a decrease in SUVmax1hour ≥10 compared with 33.3% when the SUVmax1hour decreased P = 0.004). Conclusions: Pretreatment and posttreatment 18F-FDG-PET can be useful for predicting significant response to chemoradiation in esophageal cancer. These data should be considered in evaluation of patients for esophagectomy after chemoradiation.Keywords
This publication has 33 references indexed in Scilit:
- Proposed Revision of the Esophageal Cancer Staging System to Accommodate Pathologic Response (pP) Following Preoperative Chemoradiation (CRT)Annals of Surgery, 2005
- Chemoradiation With and Without Surgery in Patients With Locally Advanced Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the EsophagusJournal of Clinical Oncology, 2005
- Utility of PET, CT, and EUS to Identify Pathologic Responders in Esophageal CancerThe Annals of Thoracic Surgery, 2004
- 2‐Fluoro‐2‐deoxy‐D‐glucose positron emission tomography imaging is predictive of pathologic response and survival after preoperative chemoradiation in patients with esophageal carcinomaCancer, 2004
- Time Course of Tumor Metabolic Activity During Chemoradiotherapy of Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma and Response to TreatmentJournal of Clinical Oncology, 2004
- Esophageal CancerNew England Journal of Medicine, 2003
- DiscussionThe Annals of Thoracic Surgery, 1999
- Chemoradiotherapy Followed by Surgery Compared with Surgery Alone in Squamous-Cell Cancer of the EsophagusNew England Journal of Medicine, 1997
- Downstaging of Esophageal Cancer After Preoperative Radiation and ChemotherapyAnnals of Surgery, 1995
- Combined Chemotherapy and Radiotherapy Compared with Radiotherapy Alone in Patients with Cancer of the EsophagusNew England Journal of Medicine, 1992