Medicaid and Prenatal Care
- 7 November 1990
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Medical Association (AMA)
- Vol. 264 (17) , 2264-2265
- https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.1990.03450170112033
Abstract
The findings reported by Piper and colleagues1that appear in this issue ofThe Journalshould not be baffling or discouraging to policymakers concerned with reducing the nation's infant mortality rate. The authors evaluate the effects in Tennessee of the first of a series of expansions in Medicaid eligibility that were intended to improve the outcome of pregnancy among women with low incomes. This report, and others that will surely follow, should help shape future maternal and child health financing policies. Since the early 1980s, Congress has repeatedly amended Medicaid (Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act, 1981, 1986, 1987, and 1989; Deficit Reduction Act, 1984; Consolidated Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act, 1985; and Catastrophic Care, 1988) to expand incremental eligibility for pregnant women and infants.2Congress initially conceptualized infant mortality as a problem of access to health care. Congressional action was influenced by the findings of the Institute of Medicine's CommitteeKeywords
This publication has 2 references indexed in Scilit:
- Source of prenatal care and infant birth weight: The case of a North Carolina countyAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1987
- Perinatal outcomes among Medicaid recipients in California.American Journal of Public Health, 1984