The role of hospital volume in coronary artery bypass grafting: is more always better?11>Presented, in part, at the Annual Meeting of the American Heart Association in New Orleans, Louisiana, on November 13, 2000.
Open Access
- 29 November 2001
- journal article
- conference paper
- Published by Elsevier in Journal of the American College of Cardiology
- Vol. 38 (7) , 1923-1930
- https://doi.org/10.1016/s0735-1097(01)01647-3
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 20 references indexed in Scilit:
- Should we regionalize major surgery? potential benefits and policy considerations1Journal of the American College of Surgeons, 2000
- ACC/AHA guidelines for coronary artery bypass graft surgery: A report of the American College of Cardiology/ American Heart Association task force on Practice Guidelines (Committee to revise the 1991 Guidelines for Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery)Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 1999
- Effects of Admission to a Teaching Hospital on the Cost and Quality of Care for Medicare BeneficiariesNew England Journal of Medicine, 1999
- Volume requirements for cardiac surgery credentialing: A critical examinationThe Annals of Thoracic Surgery, 1996
- No continuous relationship between veterans affairs hospital coronary artery bypass grafting surgical volume and operative mortalityThe Annals of Thoracic Surgery, 1996
- Outcome as a function of annual coronary artery bypass graft volumeThe Annals of Thoracic Surgery, 1996
- Volume-Outcome Relationships and Inhospital Mortality: The Effect of Changes in Volume Over TimeMedical Care, 1992
- Coronary Artery Bypass SurgeryMedical Care, 1991
- Duplicated Hospital FacilitiesNew England Journal of Medicine, 1980
- Should Operations Be Regionalized?New England Journal of Medicine, 1979