Exemplars, Prototypes, and the Flexibility of Classification Models.
- 1 January 2004
- journal article
- clinical trial
- Published by American Psychological Association (APA) in Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition
- Vol. 30 (4) , 936-941
- https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.30.4.936
Abstract
J. P. Minda and J. D. Smith (2001) showed that a prototype model outperforms an exemplar model, especially in larger categories or categories that contained more complex stimuli. R. M. Nosofsky and S. R. Zaki (2002) showed that an exemplar model with a response-scaling mechanism outperforms a prototype model. The authors of the current study investigated whether excessive model flexibility could explain these results. Using cross-validation, the authors demonstrated that both the prototype model and the exemplar model with a response-scaling mechanism suffered from overfilling in the linearly separable category structure. The results illustrate the need to make sure that the best-fitting model is not chasing error variance instead of variance attributed to the cognitive process it is supposed to model.Keywords
This publication has 16 references indexed in Scilit:
- Memory systems and perceptual categorizationPsychology of Learning and Motivation, 2002
- Toward a method of selecting among computational models of cognition.Psychological Review, 2002
- Accuracy, Scope, and Flexibility of ModelsJournal of Mathematical Psychology, 2000
- Cross-Validation MethodsJournal of Mathematical Psychology, 2000
- Relations between Prototype, Exemplar, and Decision Bound Models of CategorizationJournal of Mathematical Psychology, 1993
- Array models for category learningCognitive Psychology, 1986
- "Schema abstraction" in a multiple-trace memory model.Psychological Review, 1986
- Linear separability in classification learning.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 1981
- Context theory of classification learning.Psychological Review, 1978
- Pattern recognition and categorizationCognitive Psychology, 1972