Evidence-based obstetric ethics and informed decision-making by pregnant women about invasive diagnosis after first-trimester assessment of risk for trisomy 21
- 31 August 2005
- journal article
- Published by Elsevier in American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology
- Vol. 193 (2) , 322-326
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2005.02.134
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 15 references indexed in Scilit:
- Prospective first-trimester screening for trisomy 21 in 30,564 pregnanciesAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2005
- Multicenter study of first‐trimester screening for trisomy 21 in 75 821 pregnancies: results and estimation of the potential impact of individual risk‐orientated two‐stage first‐trimester screeningUltrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2005
- Is nuchal translucency screening associated with different rates of invasive testing in an older obstetric population?American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2004
- Screening for chromosomal abnormalities in the first trimester using ultrasound and maternal serum biochemistry in a one‐stop clinic: a review of three years prospective experienceBJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 2003
- One‐stop clinic for assessment of risk for trisomy 21 at 11–14 weeks: a prospective study of 15 030 pregnanciesUltrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2002
- A screening program for trisomy 21 at 10–14 weeks using fetal nuchal translucency, maternal serum free β‐human chorionic gonadotropin and pregnancy‐associated plasma protein‐AUltrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology, 1999
- Screening for fetal chromosomal abnormalities: need to change the rulesUltrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology, 1994
- Users' Guides to the Medical LiteratureJAMA, 1993
- Randomised comparison of amniocentesis and transabdominal and transcervical chorionic villus samplingThe Lancet, 1992
- RANDOMISED CONTROLLED TRIAL OF GENETIC AMNIOCENTESIS IN 4606 LOW-RISK WOMENPublished by Elsevier ,1986