Father Absence and Reproductive Strategy: An Evolutionary Perspective
- 1 October 1982
- journal article
- research article
- Published by University of Chicago Press in Journal of Anthropological Research
- Vol. 38 (3) , 255-273
- https://doi.org/10.1086/jar.38.3.3629848
Abstract
Explanations offered by social scientists for the effects of father absence on children are reviewed; certain aspects of these interpretations are found wanting. Another explanation using theory from evolutionary biology is suggested: children show evolved, sensitive-period learning in early childhood which is linked to mother's pair-bond status or to mother's attitude toward males. As a result of children's perceptions a developmental track is established, which influences expression of reproductive strategy in adulthood. Male children born into matrifocal households exhibit at adolescence a complex of aggression, competition, low male parental investment, and derogation of females and feminity, while females show early expression of sexual interest and assumption of sexual activity, negative attitudes toward males, and poor ability to establish long-term relationships with one male. Male children reared in father-present or nuclear households show less interest in competitive dominance with other males and more interest in manipulation of nonhuman aspects of the environment, while females show delayed sexual interest and activity and a mating strategy directed at locating a male who will invest in her and her offspring.This publication has 4 references indexed in Scilit:
- father absence and cross‐sex identity: the puberty rites controversy revisitedAmerican Ethnologist, 1975
- Sexual selection and the descent of man 1871-1971. By Bernard Campbell. x + 378 pp., figures, tables, bibliographies, index. Aldine-Atherton, Chicago. 1972. $14.75 (cloth)American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 1974
- Where's Dad?Archives of General Psychiatry, 1968
- The effects of father-absence on Norwegian boys and girls.The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 1959