Differences in reaction times and average evoked potentials as a function of direct and indirect neural pathways
- 1 June 1978
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in Annals of Neurology
- Vol. 3 (6) , 525-530
- https://doi.org/10.1002/ana.410030613
Abstract
Average evoked potentials and manual response latencies were collected during a simple detection task in which brief visual stimuli were presented to the left and right visual fields. Latencies generated by the ipsilateral stimulushand combinations were shorter than contralateral combinations only under certain conditions, impugning the hypothesis that the reaction time difference reflects interhemispheric transfer time. Certain evoked potential components recorded contralateral to the stimulus occurred earlier than their ipsilateral counterparts, but whether this difference can be interpreted as representing interhemispheric transfer time is also questioned.Keywords
This publication has 14 references indexed in Scilit:
- Augmenting Mental Chronometry: The P300 as a Measure of Stimulus Evaluation TimeScience, 1977
- An AER analysis of contralateral advantage in the transmission of auditory informationNeuropsychologia, 1976
- Electrical Signs of Selective Attention in the Human BrainScience, 1973
- Graded changes in evoked response (P300) amplitude as a function of cognitive activityPerception & Psychophysics, 1973
- Visual field differences in reaction times to Hebrew lettersPsychonomic Science, 1972
- SIMPLE REACTION TIMES OF IPSILATERAL AND CONTRALATERAL HAND TO LATERALIZED VISUAL STIMULIBrain, 1971
- Reply to McKeever and HulingPsychonomic Science, 1971
- The cerebral basis of lateral asymmetries in attentionActa Psychologica, 1970
- Laterality effects and choice reaction time in a unimanual two-finger taskPerception & Psychophysics, 1970
- Splitting the normal brain with reaction timePsychonomic Science, 1969