Choosing Regularization Parameters in Iterative Methods for Ill-Posed Problems
- 1 January 2001
- journal article
- Published by Society for Industrial & Applied Mathematics (SIAM) in SIAM Journal on Matrix Analysis and Applications
- Vol. 22 (4) , 1204-1221
- https://doi.org/10.1137/s0895479899345960
Abstract
Numerical solution of ill-posed problems is often accomplished by discretization (projection onto a finite dimensional subspace) followed by regularization. If the discrete problem has high dimension, though, typically we compute an approximate solution by projecting the discrete problem onto an even smaller dimensional space, via iterative methods based on Krylov subspaces. In this work we present a common framework for efficient algorithms that regularize after this second projection rather than before it. We show that determining regularization parameters based on the final projected problem rather than on the original discretization has firmer justification and often involves less computational expense. We prove some results on the approximate equivalence of this approach to other forms of regularization, and we present numerical examples.Keywords
This publication has 25 references indexed in Scilit:
- Fast CG-Based Methods for Tikhonov--Phillips RegularizationSIAM Journal on Scientific Computing, 1999
- Galerkin Projection Methods for Solving Multiple Linear SystemsSIAM Journal on Scientific Computing, 1999
- Estimation of the L-Curve via Lanczos BidiagonalizationBIT Numerical Mathematics, 1999
- The “Minimum Reconstruction Error” Choice of Regularization Parameters: Some More Efficient Methods and Their Application to Deconvolution ProblemsSIAM Journal on Scientific Computing, 1995
- An implicit shift bidiagonalization algorithm for ill-posed systemsBIT Numerical Mathematics, 1994
- Using the L--curve for determining optimal regularization parametersNumerische Mathematik, 1994
- Equivalence of regularization and truncated iteration in the solution of III-posed image reconstruction problemsLinear Algebra and its Applications, 1990
- A bidiagonalization algorithm for solving large and sparse ill-posed systems of linear equationsBIT Numerical Mathematics, 1988
- Generalized Cross-Validation as a Method for Choosing a Good Ridge ParameterTechnometrics, 1979
- Calculating the Singular Values and Pseudo-Inverse of a MatrixJournal of the Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics Series B Numerical Analysis, 1965